{"id":1233,"date":"2022-04-12T22:29:36","date_gmt":"2022-04-12T14:29:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/?p=1233"},"modified":"2022-04-12T23:00:21","modified_gmt":"2022-04-12T15:00:21","slug":"the-power-law-2214-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/?p=1233","title":{"rendered":"The Power Law 2214-4"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"11-accel-fb-kpcb\">11 Accel FB &amp; KPCB<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>There is a saying in our business, \u2018If you are treated like an analyst, you are going to act like an analyst,\u2019\u201d Efrusy explained later. <strong>An analyst could point out the arguments on both sides of an issue<\/strong>, but that was <strong>different from taking a stand<\/strong>, and this difference defined the psychological gulf between being a venture capitalist and not being one. In the end, <strong>venture investing came down to that scary jump from messy information to a binary yes-or-no call<\/strong>. It came down to living with the reality that you would frequently be wrong. It was about showing up at the next partners\u2019 meeting, rising above your wounded pride, and mustering the optimism to make fresh bets on a bewildering future.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u5206\u6790\u5e08\u548c\u6295\u8d44\u4eba\u7684\u533a\u522b\uff0c\u6295\u8d44\u4eba\u662f\u8981\u5206\u6790\u5b8c\u6709\u7ed3\u8bba\u7684\uff1aYES or NO.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But the serious reason for the meeting was that <strong>Accel had closed only four deals so far that year<\/strong>, fewer than most of its rivals. A series of slides listed <strong>sixty-two software or internet investments<\/strong> done by other top firms; next to some there were notes saying, \u201cAware\u2014lost?\u201d or \u201cAware\u2014didn\u2019t evaluate,\u201d signifying that Accel had failed to invest despite knowing of the opportunity. The slides also noted the particular promise of a new kind of online business. If Internet 1.0 had been about selling stuff (Amazon, eBay), I<strong>nternet 2.0 was about using the web as a communications medium<\/strong>. \u201c\u20182.0\u2019 frenzy around social networking; <strong>Accel may have missed the boat<\/strong>,\u201d one slide read. Having recognized Internet 2.0 as a hot field, the partnership\u2019s leaders encouraged Efrusy and other junior members of the team to go after it. <strong>The way Accel\u2019s founders saw things, there was a link between deliberately choosing a promising investment space, thereby reducing risk, and empowering the novices, thereby embracing risk<\/strong>. \u201cIt is a lot easier to turn young investors loose if you know they are working fertile ground,\u201d Jim Swartz said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Accel\u7684\u4f4e\u6f6e\u671f\uff0c2004\u5e74\u4ec5\u6295\u4e864\u4e2a\u9879\u76ee\uff0c\u9519\u8fc7\u4e8662\u4e2a\uff0c\u4e00\u4e2a\u4e2a\u62ce\u51fa\u6765\u5206\u6790\uff0c\u53d1\u73b0web2.0\u7684\u673a\u4f1a\u53ef\u80fd\u8d76\u4e0d\u4e0a\u4e86\uff0c\u9f13\u52b1\u5e74\u8f7b\u4eba\u91cd\u70b9\u627e\u91cc\u9762\u7684\u673a\u4f1a\u3002\u57fa\u91d1\u7684\u521b\u59cb\u4eba\u4eec\u4e5f\u80fd\u770b\u5230\u7ed9\u5e74\u8f7b\u521b\u59cb\u4eba\u8d4b\u80fd\u62e5\u62b1\u98ce\u9669\u548c\u9009\u62e9\u4e00\u4e2a\u6709\u524d\u666f\u7684\u9886\u57df\u9010\u6b65\u964d\u4f4e\u98ce\u9669\u7684\u8fde\u63a5\uff0c\u5176\u5b9e\u662f\u4e00\u4ef6\u4e8b\uff1a\u9009\u597d\u65b9\u5411\u3001\u627e\u5230\u597d\u7684\u521b\u59cb\u4eba\u8d4b\u80fd\u3001\u62e5\u62b1\u4f46\u662f\u6301\u7eed\u964d\u4f4e\u98ce\u9669\u3002\u8fd9\u4e2a\u7b56\u7565\u6bd4\u8f83\u4e3b\u6d41\uff0c\u4e5f\u7b97\u662fHands off\u7684\u98ce\u683c\u4e86\uff0c\u4f46\u8fd8\u662f\u5ef6\u7eed\u4e86prepared mind\u7684\u884c\u4e1a\u601d\u8def\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As Skype\u2019s value soared, the Accel partners recognized the magnitude of their error. <strong>In venture, backing a project that goes to zero costs you one times your money. Missing a project that returns 100x is massively more painful.<\/strong> \u201cThere were some colleagues who said we should have locked the Skype guys in a room and not let them out until they signed,\u201d Golden remembered, perhaps with Efrusy in mind. \u201cThere was a lot of frustration within the partnership.\u201dBut the good news was that Accel\u2019s <strong>distinctive culture<\/strong> gave it a way of processing its miss. It could build on the <strong>prepared-mind exercise<\/strong> begun in Sausalito.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>In a world of power-law returns, the costs of missing out were higher by far than the risk of losing one times your money<\/strong>. As one of the keenest proponents of the Skype deal, Efrusy could see that the partnership\u2019s mindset had evolved. Accel would not be weirded out by the next Skype-type opportunity. \u201cWhen I first arrived at Accel, I thought prepared mind was bullshit,\u201d Efrusy recalled later. \u201cIt isn\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u9519\u8fc7\u673a\u4f1a\u7684\u6210\u672c\u662f\u5de8\u5927\u7684\uff0c\u4e5f\u662f\u6781\u5176\u75db\u82e6\u7684\uff0c\u8fd9\u5c31\u662f\u5e42\u5f8b\u5b9a\u5f8b\u3002<strong>\u6295\u9519\u4e00\u4e2a\u4ec5\u4ec5\u662f\u4e8f\u4e86\u672c\u91d1\uff0c\u4f46\u9519\u8fc7\u4e00\u4e2a\uff0c\u81f3\u5c11\u662f\u9519\u8fc7\u4e00\u652f\u57fa\u91d1\uff0c\u8fd8\u53ef\u80fd\u662f\u9519\u8fc7\u4eba\u751f\u7684\u524d\u666f\u3002\u8fd9\u4e2a\u89c2\u70b9\u8ba9\u6211\u5f00\u59cb\u53cd\u601d\u8fc7\u53bb\u7684\u770b\u6cd5\uff0c\u8fd9\u5176\u5b9e\u5c31\u662f\u8fd9\u4e2a\u884c\u4e1a\u7684\u6e38\u620f\u89c4\u5219\uff0c\u4e00\u81f4\u4fdd\u5b88\uff0c\u53ef\u80fd\u4e0d\u4f1a\u51fa\u5c40\uff0c\u4e0d\u4f1a\u6709\u5927\u8f93\uff0c\u4f46\u4e5f\u4e00\u5b9a\u4e0d\u4f1a\u6709\u51fa\u8def\u3002<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Efrusy <strong>pulled all the standard tricks<\/strong> to get around this obstacle. Through <strong>a friend who had interviewed <\/strong>for a job with Thefacebook, he got an appointment to talk by phone with Parker. Then Parker canceled on him. Next, Efrusy discovered that <strong>another friend, Matt Cohler, had recently begun working for Parker<\/strong>. He called and asked for a second introduction. Sorry, Cohler said. Parker wasn\u2019t interested. In early 2005, Efrusy heard from a colleague that Thefacebook had begun talking to other investors. He took a deep breath and <strong>emailed his contacts again<\/strong>. When nobody answered, Efrusy resorted to that old technology: <strong>the phone<\/strong>. Parker refused to return his voice messages. Efrusy now opened up a third channel. He learned that Reid Hoffman, the founder of LinkedIn, had invested in Thefacebook. An Accel partner named Peter Fenton was close to Hoffman. <strong>Efrusy asked Fenton to help him<\/strong>. Fenton called Hoffman and hit the same wall: Thefacebook wasn\u2019t open to a meeting. This time, however, <strong>the rejection was paired with a reason<\/strong>. As Hoffman explained it, Parker and Zuckerberg believed that venture capitalists would never understand their firm. They would not pay fair value for it. Hoffman also mentioned that Thefacebook had an offer at a high valuation from a corporate investor. \u201cYou\u2019re not going to pay as much. This isn\u2019t worth your time,\u201d he said, as though not meeting Thefacebook might be in Accel\u2019s best interest. Fenton relayed the message to Efrusy. \u201cIt is worth my time!\u201d Efrusy insisted. \u201cI don\u2019t value my time as much as you value yours.\u201d <strong>Fenton called Hoffman again<\/strong>. \u201cIt\u2019s worth our time,\u201d he told him.Having given a reason for the rejection, Hoffman felt obliged to help when that reason was invalidated. If Accel promised to take Thefacebook seriously\u2014if it promised not to make an insulting lowball offer\u2014then Hoffman would arrange a meeting with Parker. Even after this, <strong>no meeting transpired<\/strong>. Hoffman did his best. But Parker was in hiding. On April Fools\u2019 Day 2005, Efrusy grew tired of waiting. Emails had not worked. Telephoning had not worked. He had deployed three different intermediaries. There was one last maneuver he could try. He resolved to <strong>show up at Thefacebook<\/strong> in person, with or without an appointment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It was a Friday afternoon, and Efrusy asked another thirtysomething colleague if he would accompany him. A visit from two Accel investors would make a stronger impression than a visit from one. And if Efrusy was going to sell the deal to his colleagues, he could always use an ally. Efrusy\u2019s young colleague was busy. But, in a testament to Accel\u2019s <strong>collaborative culture<\/strong>, Efrusy felt able to rope in the other investor who happened to be in the building:<strong> Arthur Patterson, the firm\u2019s co-founder<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u7528\u904d\u4e867\u79cd\u65b9\u5f0f\uff08\u9762\u8bd5\u7684\u670b\u53cb\u3001\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u670b\u53cb\u3001\u90ae\u4ef6\u3001\u7535\u8bdd\u3001\u901a\u8fc7\u5408\u4f19\u4eba\u627eAngel\u5e2e\u5fd92\u6b21\u3001\u76f4\u63a5\u964c\u751f\u62dc\u8bbf\u8fd8\u62c9\u4e0a\u4e86\u57fa\u91d1\u521b\u59cb\u4eba\uff09\u624d\u89c1\u5230\u4e862005\u5e74Facebook\u7684\u5e74\u8f7bCEO\u4eec\uff0c\u4e00\u5bb6\u8ba1\u5212\u4f30\u503c6000w\u4f30\u503c\u878dA\u8f6e\u7684\u516c\u53f8\u3002\u8fd9\u4e48\u505a\u7684\u524d\u63d0\u9996\u5148\u662f\u5224\u65adFacebook\u662f\u4e00\u4e2a\u5386\u53f2\u6027\u6295\u8d44\u673a\u4f1a\uff0c\u52a0\u4e0a\u8fd9\u6837\u771f\u6b63\u4e0d\u61c8\u7684\u52aa\u529b\uff0c\u597d\u8fd0\u6c14\u662f\u5fc5\u7136\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Knowing the founders\u2019 impatience with questions from VCs, Efrusy avoided asking any. \u201cI get how valuable this could be,\u201d he assured Parker and Zuckerberg, preempting what he knew to be their doubt. \u201cCome to our partnership meeting on Monday, and I promise I\u2019ll either give you a term sheet by the end of the day Monday, or you\u2019ll never hear from me again. Thefacebook confronted no trade-off between expanding user numbers and diminishing user engagement. When the meeting was done, Accel\u2019s verdict was unanimous. Nobody minded about Zuckerberg\u2019s mute style. Nobody brought up the alarming sexual imagery at the Facebook office. Nor did anybody worry about the fact that Sequoia\u2019s leaders, Michael Moritz and Doug Leone, had warned Accel to be wary of Parker. <strong>The only thing that mattered was the exploding popularity of the product<\/strong>. The fact that Zuckerberg was too young to buy a beer merely added to his authenticity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Accel\u770b\u4f3c\u518d\u4f4e\u4e09\u4e0b\u56db\u7684\u8ffd\u9879\u76ee\uff0c\u751a\u81f3\u53d7\u5230\u521b\u59cb\u4eba\u7684\u4e0d\u53cb\u597d\u5bf9\u5f85\uff0c\u5927\u5bb6\u90fd\u6e05\u695a\u552f\u4e00\u91cd\u8981\u7684\u662f\u4ea7\u54c1\u7684\u7206\u70b8\u6027\u589e\u957f\uff0c\u4ee5\u53ca\u53ef\u80fd\u5e26\u6765\u7684\u5de8\u989d\u56de\u62a5\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The question was how to get Thefacebook to accept Accel\u2019s capital. The partnership knew it was up against a corporate investor, probably a big media firm, and Parker had revealed the terms that the rival was offering: a pre-money valuation\u2014that is, the value without counting the new capital going in\u2014of $60 million. After some deliberation, Accel sent Thefacebook a term sheet valuing it at the same <strong>$60 million<\/strong> price, but with an offer to<strong> inject more money<\/strong> than the other bidder. That night, Cohler sent an email back:<strong> thank you but no thank you<\/strong>. <strong>Evidently, the rival bid was real.<\/strong> By now, Accel\u2019s well-connected managing partner, Jim Breyer, had figured out that it was almost certainly from the <strong>Washington Post<\/strong> Company. The next day the Accel team regrouped to consider <strong>how much to increase its offer<\/strong>. That afternoon, Efrusy and two colleagues marched down University Avenue, <strong>catching Thefacebook gang midway through a meeting<\/strong>. He slapped down a new offer. Accel was now valuing Thefacebook at fully <strong>$70 million <\/strong>before any new capital went in. It proposed to invest $10 million in the firm, taking the post-money valuation to $80 million.For once, <strong>Parker was impressed. \u201cOkay, this is worth considering,\u201d<\/strong> he conceded. Graham was not prepared to get into a bidding war. His friend and mentor Warren Buffett had schooled him in the <strong>discipline of value investing<\/strong>, and he regarded Silicon Valley\u2019s power-law mentality with suspicion.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>For the venture-capital industry, the Facebook deal showed how a traditional partnership could navigate the youth revolt<\/strong>. It could <strong>gather intelligence<\/strong> from a Stanford grad student. It could <strong>train and empower an investor<\/strong> in his early thirties. It could <strong>deploy the worldliness and connections<\/strong> of the forty-something managing partner. It could even<strong> draw on the investment judgment<\/strong> of its sixty-year-old founder. <strong>When Facebook went public in 2012, Accel reaped an astonishing profit of more than $12 billion<\/strong>. For shrugging off the slings and arrows of arrogant youth, the partnership had been amply rewarded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u5373\u4fbf\u548cParker\u63a5\u89e6\u4e0a\u4e86\uff0c\u516c\u53f8\u4e5f\u8fbe\u6210\u4e00\u81f4\uff0c\u4f46\u5982\u4f55\u6295\u8fdb\u53bb\u8fd8\u662f\u4e0d\u5bb9\u6613\u7684\u3002\u7279\u522b\u662f\u5df2\u7ecf\u6709\u4e86\u6295\u8d44\u4eba\u7684\u60c5\u51b5\u4e0b\uff0cAccel\u5148\u7ed9\u4e86\u4e00\u6837\u4f30\u503c\u7684offer\uff0c\u6536\u5230\u4e0d\u591f\u70ed\u60c5\u7684\u56de\u590d\u540e\u80fd\u770b\u51fa\u6765\u7ade\u4e89\u5bf9\u624b\uff0c\u4e0b\u73ed\u8def\u4e0a\u628a\u4eba\u622a\u4f4f\u7ed9\u4e86\u66f4\u9ad8\u7684offer\uff0c\u94b1\u4e5f\u66f4\u591a\uff0c\u53d8\u5f97\u6709\u5438\u5f15\u529b\u4e86\u3002\u5bf9\u624b\u6ca1\u52a0\u4ef7\uff0cAccel\u624d\u987a\u5229\u62ff\u4e0b\u3002\u8fd9\u5176\u4e2d\u4f5c\u8005\u603b\u7ed3\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u673a\u6784\u5982\u4f55\u8ba920\u591a\u5c81\u7684\u5b9e\u4e60\u751f\u5e2e\u5fd9\u641c\u96c6\u5230\u4fe1\u606f\u3001\u53d1\u73b0\u673a\u4f1a\uff0c\u8ba930\u5de6\u53f3\u7684\u6295\u8d44\u7ecf\u7406\u5386\u7ec3\u597d\uff0c\u8ba940\u5de6\u53f3\u7684\u5408\u4f19\u4eba\u7528\u4e0a\u5168\u7403\u7684\u5173\u7cfb\u6765\u5e2e\u5fd9\uff0c\u6700\u540e\u8ba960\u5de6\u53f3\u57fa\u91d1\u521b\u59cb\u4eba\u5f62\u6210\u6295\u8d44\u5224\u65ad\uff0c\u8fd9\u662f\u4e2a\u975e\u5e38\u597d\u7684\u914d\u5408\uff0c\u8fd9\u6837\u7684\u673a\u6784\u4e5f\u582a\u79f0\u901a\u529b\u534f\u4f5c\u7684\u5178\u8303\u4e86\uff0c\u503c\u5f97\u6211\u4eec\u5b66\u4e60\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By around 2015, after a series of mediocre funds, Kleiner had disappeared from the top table.Kleiner\u2019s descent was especially striking because of the <strong>path dependency <\/strong>in venture performance. VCs who back winning startups acquire a<strong> reputation for success<\/strong>, which in turn gives them the first shot at the next cohort of potential winners.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kleiner\u2019s fall from grace is commonly ascribed to a s<strong>pectacularly bad investment call<\/strong>. Starting in 2004, the firm p<strong>ursued so-called cleantech startups\u2014bets on technologies<\/strong> that help fight climate change, from solar power to biofuels to electric vehicles. In 2008, Kleiner <strong>doubled down, devoting a new $1 billion<\/strong> growth fund exclusively to this sector. The commitment reflected a mixture of idealism and wishful thinking. John Doerr, Kleiner\u2019s dominant partner, was unabashedly emotional in his public promises to help save the planet. He liked to quote Mary, his teenage daughter: \u201cDad, your generation created this problem; you\u2019d better fix it.\u201d At the same time, Doerr insisted on the financial case for going green, reminding audiences that energy was a $6 trillion business.\u201cWell, I\u2019ll tell you what. Green technologies\u2014going green\u2014is bigger than the Internet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>KPCB\u7684\u8870\u843d\u662f\u5176\u8def\u5f84\u4f9d\u8d56\u7684\u7ed3\u679c\u30022004\u5e74\u57fa\u91d1\u5f00\u59cb\u5f80\u6e05\u6d01\u79d1\u6280\u65b9\u5411\u6295\u8d44\uff0c2008\u5e74\u7ee7\u7eed\u53cc\u500d\u4e0b\u6ce8\u3002\u4f46\u8fd9\u4e2a\u9886\u57df\u7684\u53d1\u5c55\u6ca1\u90a3\u4e48\u5feb\uff0c\u5bfc\u81f4\u4e86\u8fd9\u4e00\u5207\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For Kleiner\u2019s limited partners, the upshot was painful. The first wave of green investments did particularly poorly, and the venture funds raised in 2004, 2006, and 2008 suffered accordingly. A dozen years after investing in the 2006 fund, one limited partner complained that he had <strong>lost almost half his capital.<\/strong> Kleiner\u2019s second cleantech wave, starting with the green growth fund raised in 2008, did better. The partnership homed in on businesses that did have a moat, and produced a few dramatic hits: as of 2021, the plant-based meat company <strong>Beyond Meat had generated 107x,<\/strong> the battery maker QuantumScape had made 65x, and the \u201csmart solar\u201d company Enphase had produced 25x. This was enough to generate at least one venture fund that ranked in the industry\u2019s top quartile. But Kleiner\u2019s overall performance remained dull.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u51e0\u671f\u57fa\u91d1\u8868\u73b0\u90fd\u4e0d\u597d\uff0c06\u5e74\u7684\u57fa\u91d1\u4e8f\u4e86\u8fd1\u534a\uff0c08\u5e74\u7684\u57fa\u91d1\u597d\u5f88\u591a\uff0c\u4e5f\u6295\u51fa\u4e86\u4e0d\u5c11\u597d\u9879\u76ee\uff0c\u4f46\u6574\u4f53\u4e00\u822c\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As Accel\u2019s Facebook deal suggested, and as many other case studies confirm, <strong>venture capital is a team sport<\/strong>: it often takes multiple partners to land a home-run deal, and the investors who lead the chase are not always the same as the stewards who guide the portfolio companies after the deals have been completed. For a venture team to work productively, the <strong>culture of the partnership has to be right<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is what Kleiner Perkins mismanaged spectacularly. In the early years of KPCB, the partnership had appeared lopsided. Tom Perkins was the flamboyant and domineering rainmaker, and he overshadowed the other three named partners. But if you looked under the hood, the <strong>other partners did matter<\/strong>\u2014not necessarily because of their investments, but because of<strong> their effect on Perkins<\/strong>. <strong>When the big man\u2019s ideas were crazy, they talked him down. When his temper threatened to blow up a deal, they knew how to smooth things over.<\/strong> On one such occasion in 1983, Mitch Kapor showed up at the Kleiner office to pitch Lotus Development. For no evident reason, Perkins flew into a fury. \u201cI don\u2019t see why I should waste my time listening to some company that we are obviously not going to invest in,\u201d he barked, storming off to his office. John Doerr, then three years into his career at Kleiner, looked like an inflatable balloon figure that had sprung a leak. He had worked hard with Kapor to prepare the pitch; now the pitch seemed dead before delivery. But at this point in the story, the value of teamwork came into play. Frank Caufield, one of the partnership\u2019s unsung investors, assured Doerr that he would talk sense into Perkins; he knew how to make him laugh and bring him down from his high pedestal. With Doerr sufficiently reflated, the Lotus pitch went ahead, and everyone ignored the brooding figure of Perkins, visible through the glass wall of the conference room. <strong>Thanks to Caufield\u2019s intervention, the tantrum did not matter and the deal was done<\/strong>. Perkins\u2019s volatility, which could have cost the partnership millions, had been elegantly managed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the first decade of the twenty-first century, however, <strong>Kleiner Perkins lost this equilibrium<\/strong>. Part of the problem was that the firm grew. Whereas traditional partnerships such as <strong>Benchmark still had only half a dozen general partners<\/strong>, Kleiner now had about ten\u2014plus various senior advisers and junior investors. In 2004, Vinod Khosla tired of this unwieldy structure and quit to set up his own shop, <strong>leaving Doerr without an intellectual counterweight<\/strong>. That same year, Mackenzie and Compton followed, creating a firm called Radar Partners. <strong>Doerr replaced these seasoned colleagues with a string of famous names<\/strong>. In 2000 he had hired Ray Lane, who had driven the success of Oracle. In 2005 he followed up with Bill Joy, a cofounder of Sun Microsystems, and the former secretary of state Colin Powell. In 2007, Doerr rounded out his team by adding the former vice president Al Gore as a sort of adjunct senior partner. The newcomers had no investment experience and were in <strong>their fifties or sixties<\/strong>. Kleiner had effectively embraced the opposite of the philosophy at Accel, which believed in <strong>recruiting hungry up-and-comers and training them<\/strong>. This change in Kleiner\u2019s culture <strong>set the stage for the cleantech fiasco.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong> When Doerr decided to bet the franchise on a challenging sector, nobody was there to check him<\/strong>.\u201c<strong>If it\u2019s not 10x different, it\u2019s not different<\/strong>,\u201d went his mantra. If Kleiner had not suffered a brain drain, Compton and Mackenzie would have been on hand to make these arguments. But without the old gang at the table, \u201c<strong>John became impossible to challenge<\/strong>,\u201d an insider recalled, probably exaggerating only slightly. Tom Perkins\u2019s firm went from being a white-hot-risk eliminator to a Hail Mary risk-taker.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VC\u6295\u8d44\u9700\u8981\u56e2\u961f\u914d\u5408\uff0c\u50cf\u4f53\u80b2\u6d3b\u52a8\u4e00\u6837\u3002Accel\u5efa\u7acb\u4e86\u597d\u7684\u699c\u6837\uff0c\u62db\u52df\u548c\u8bad\u7ec3\u90a3\u4e9b\u6709\u671d\u6c14\u3001\u6025\u8feb\u611f\u7684\u5e74\u8f7b\u4eba\uff0cKPCB\u7684\u95ee\u9898\u4e3b\u8981\u662f\u627e\u4e86\u4e00\u580650-60\u5c81\u7684\u77e5\u540d\u4eba\u58eb\u52a0\u76df\uff0c\u540d\u6c14\u5f88\u5927\uff0c\u4f46\u4e0d\u4f1a\u63d0\u4f9b\u4e0d\u540c\u610f\u89c1\u3002\u8fd9\u5c31\u8ba9\u672c\u6765\u5408\u4f19\u4eba\u5171\u540c\u53c2\u4e0e\u51b3\u7b56\u7684\u673a\u5236\u53d8\u6210\u4e86Doerr\u4e00\u8a00\u5802\uff0c\u8bf4\u4ec0\u4e48\u662f\u4ec0\u4e48\uff0c\u5931\u8d25\u5c31\u4e0d\u8fdc\u4e86\u3002\u8fd9\u4e5f\u662f\u5bf9\u673a\u6784\u8d1f\u8d23\u4eba\u800c\u8a00\u5de8\u5927\u7684\u6559\u8bad\uff0c\u8981\u6253\u9020\u4e00\u652f\u80fd\u597d\u597d\u914d\u5408\u597d\u7684\u56e2\u961f\u3001\u80fd\u4e92\u76f8\u53d6\u957f\u8865\u77ed\u7684\u56e2\u961f\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"12-growth-equity-yuri-tiger\">12 Growth Equity Yuri &amp; Tiger<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Milner continued, Facebook lagged foreign social-media sites in converting users into revenues.<\/strong> By virtue of being in Silicon Valley, Zuckerberg had found it easy to raise money from investors, so he had faced limited pressure to squeeze money out of customers. <strong>In contrast, foreign social-media businesses had been forced to maximize revenue from the get-go<\/strong>. Again, the multi-country spreadsheet tabulated this phenomenon, allowing Milner to point out that <strong>Facebook was an outlier<\/strong>. In China, most social-media revenues came from selling virtual gifts, an option that Facebook had not even tried. <strong>In Russia, VKontakte\u2019s revenues per user were fully five times Facebook\u2019s<\/strong>. <strong>International experience demonstrated that Zuckerberg had enormous room to monetize mindshare<\/strong>. Thanks to his <strong>global perspective<\/strong>, the Russian who had never set foot in the Valley understood Facebook better than the Palo Alto mafia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Andreessen knew otherwise. Milner was neither crazy nor dumb, nor was he even impetuous in the way that Masayoshi Son was. To the contrary, what <strong>distinguished Milner was his data-driven approach<\/strong>. He had meticulously compiled the key metrics on the world\u2019s social-media firms, and his revenue projections told him that a $10 billion valuation was reasonable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yuri\u6562\u4e8e2007\u5e74\u6309100\u4ebf\u4f30\u503c\u6295\u8d442\u4ebf\u7f8e\u5143\u5230Facebook\uff0c\u4e0d\u662f\u83bd\u649e\uff0c\u80cc\u540e\u662f\u7f1c\u5bc6\u7684\u5206\u6790\u3002\u5168\u7403\u7684\u793e\u4ea4\u7f51\u7ad9\u7684\u53d8\u73b0\u90fd\u4e0d\u9519\uff0c\u4fc4\u7f57\u65af\u7684\u516c\u53f8\u53d8\u73b0\u80fd\u529b\u662fFacebook\u76845\u500d\u4ee5\u4e0a\uff0cFB\u6ca1\u505a\u6536\u5165\u662f\u56e0\u4e3a\u878d\u8d44\u592a\u5bb9\u6613\u4e86\uff0c\u5c31\u6ca1\u6709\u538b\u529b\uff0c\u4f46\u4e0d\u662f\u6ca1\u6709\u6f5c\u529b\uff0c\u76f8\u53cd\u6f5c\u529b\u5de8\u5927\uff0c\u4e5f\u662f\u5de8\u5927\u7684\u673a\u4f1a\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Over the next weeks, Milner <strong>sweetened his bid with two innovations<\/strong>. He knew that Zuckerberg jealously protected his control over Facebook, recently spurning an advance from an investor who had demanded two board votes. So he declared he would <strong>not take a board seat<\/strong>\u2014not even one\u2014and Zuckerberg would<strong> get the right to vote<\/strong> Milner\u2019s shares as he wanted. In one stroke, the entrepreneur\u2019s chief qualm about raising money was erased. Rather than diluting the founder\u2019s control over his company, a capital injection from Milner would concentrate it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Milner promised to fix this problem. He would <strong>happily buy employee stock<\/strong> in addition to shares freshly issued by the company. What\u2019s more, he proposed a clever twist: he would pay one price for the company-issued (or \u201cprimary\u201d) stock and a different, lower price for the secondary stock sold by Facebook workers. Up to a point, it was obvious that the primary stock should be worth more: it was \u201cpreferred,\u201d meaning that it came with some protections against losses. But Milner used the two-tier pricing to add a secret weapon to his negotiating arsenal. He could offer Zuckerberg a satisfying valuation for Facebook\u2019s primary stock while <strong>holding down the cost of acquisition<\/strong> by lowballing his offer to employees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yuri\u5728FB\u9879\u76ee\u4e0a\u7ed9\u4e86Zuck\u4e24\u4e2a\u65e0\u6cd5\u62d2\u7edd\u7684\u7406\u7531\uff1a\u4e0d\u8981\u8463\u4e8b\u4f1a\u5e2d\u4f4d\u3001\u6295\u7968\u6743\u53ef\u4ee5\u59d4\u6258\u7ed9CEO\uff0c\u8fd9\u4e2a\u51e0\u4e4e\u4ece\u6765\u6ca1\u6709\u8fc7\u3002\u5c31\u8fde\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u671f\u6743\u538b\u529b\u4ed6\u4e5f\u5e2e\u5fd9\u89e3\u51b3\uff0c\u6295\u8d44\u66f4\u591a\u4e70\u8fdb\u6765\uff0c\u8fd9\u4e0d\u662f\u9ebb\u70e6\uff0c\u662f\u597d\u4e8b\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Needless to say, Milner reaped a bonanza. <strong>Facebook\u2019s audience and revenues exploded, just as he had predicted<\/strong>. Eighteen months later, in late 2010, the company was valued at $50 billion. DST was sitting on a profit of more than $1.5 billion, and Facebook continued to head skyward.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For Silicon Valley, it was a <strong>watershed<\/strong>. Thirteen years earlier, Masayoshi Son had shocked the traditional venture shops by foisting $100 million on Yahoo. In contrast, Milner had initially bought more than $300 million worth of Facebook. In the 1970s, hands-on venture investors had invented the idea of<strong> building governance around a startup founder<\/strong>. Now Milner was <strong>inverting the model. <\/strong>He was <strong>protecting founders from governance<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yuri\u51c6\u786e\u9884\u6d4b\u4e86FB\u7684\u6210\u957f\uff0c18\u4e2a\u6708\u4e4b\u540e\u4f30\u503c\u5c31\u7ffb\u4e865\u500d\u5230500\u4ebf\u7f8e\u5143\u4e86\uff0c\u6d6e\u76c815\u4ebf\u3002\u8fd9\u662f\u7845\u8c37\u751f\u610f\u7684\u53e6\u4e00\u4e2a\u5206\u6c34\u5cad\u3002\u4e0d\u540c\u4e8e70\u5e74\u4ee3\u7684VC\u53d1\u660e\u7684\u4e00\u4e9b\u5217\u7ba1\u7406\u521b\u59cb\u4eba\u7684\u65b9\u6cd5\uff0cYuri\u53cd\u8fc7\u6765\u5e2e\u521b\u59cb\u4eba\u89c4\u907f\u8fd9\u4e9b\u7ba1\u6cbb\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Shleifer homed in on the part of his friend\u2019s spreadsheet listing the Chinese web portals that had gone public just before the bubble burst: Sina, Sohu, and NetEase. All three had <strong>taken off<\/strong> with the help of venture capitalists like Shirley Lin and Kathy Xu, who had bet on the <strong>character of the founders<\/strong> and the <strong>potential of their markets<\/strong>. But now Shleifer would apply a different kind of investment skill. The three portals had<strong> matured to the point <\/strong>where they had customers, revenues, and costs. An analyst with twelve hundred hours of training at Blackstone could <strong>model their fair value<\/strong>. Shleifer began by applying a technique that was standard at Blackstone but foreign to most Valley investors. Rather than looking at profit margins, he looked at<strong> incremental margins<\/strong>, meaning the share of revenue growth that falls to the bottom line as profits. Any amateur could see that the three Chinese portals all had negative margins; put simply, they were losing money. But a <strong>pro would know to focus on the incremental picture, and this looked spectacularly positive<\/strong>. As revenues grew, costs grew much less, so <strong>most of the additional income showed up as profits<\/strong>. It followed that growth would soon drive the three portals into the black. <strong>By thinking incrementally, Shleifer could see into the future.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tiger\u7684Growth Equity\u4e1a\u52a1\u8d77\u70b9\u5c31\u662f\u8fd9\u6837\u4e00\u4e2a\u5206\u6790\u5e08\u7684\u8e0f\u5b9e\u5de5\u4f5c\uff0c\u7528\u5bf9\u51b2\u57fa\u91d1\u7684\u5206\u6790\u65b9\u6cd5\u770b\u521a\u4e0a\u5e02\u7684\u4e2d\u56fd\u4e92\u8054\u7f51\u516c\u53f8\uff0c\u4e0d\u50cf\u4e1a\u4f59\u6295\u8d44\u4eba\u76f4\u63a5\u770b\u5230\u7684\u4e8f\u635f\uff0c\u800c\u662f\u4e13\u4e1a\u5730\u770b\u5230\u6bdb\u5229\u9010\u6e10\u597d\u8f6c\u7684\u8d8b\u52bf\uff0c\u770b\u5230\u6295\u8d44\u4ef7\u503c\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Feeling his excitement build, Shleifer took his notes from <strong>the phone calls <\/strong>and fed them into his earnings model. For now, of course, the portals were losing money. But because revenues were growing much faster than costs, profits in 2003 were set to surge: they would come in at around one-third of the companies\u2019 market capitalization. In 2004, Shleifer calculated, the profits might equal two-thirds of market cap, and for 2005 he penciled in a <strong>one-for-one ratio<\/strong>. Said differently, an investor could buy these portals almost for free. If Tiger Global put in, say, $10 million, it would acquire a claim on $3.3 million of profits the first year and $6.7 million the second year, so it would have earned its cost of acquisition back. In the third year it would have a claim on another $10 million in earnings, with the out-years promising exponential bonanzas. After staying up all night, Shleifer walked into Coleman\u2019s office. \u201cOkay, Sina, Sohu, and NetEase,\u201d he announced. \u201cLet\u2019s dance,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>During September and October 2002, Tiger Global duly bought $20 million worth of Sina, Sohu, and NetEase, committing a bit under a tenth of the fund\u2019s $250 million portfolio. A tiny team of New Yorkers became the largest public shareholder in China\u2019s digital economy. By the summer of 2003, Tiger Global\u2019s China positions were up between 5x and 10x.[20] In less than a year, a $250 million hedge fund had become a $350 million one. <strong>Coleman elevated Shleifer to partner <\/strong>and moved him from his cubicle into an office. Together, the two were advancing down the path that would lead to Yuri Milner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u8d22\u52a1\u5206\u6790\u7684\u7ed3\u679c\u975e\u5e38\u660e\u663e\uff0c\u4f30\u503c\u76f8\u5f53\u4e8e2003\u5e743\u500dP\/E\uff0c2005\u5e741\u500dP\/E\uff0c\u679c\u65ad\u6295\u5165\u4e862000w\uff0c\u4e00\u5e74\u540e\u76842003\u5e74\u6da8\u4e865-10x\uff0c\u8ba9\u57fa\u91d1\u56de\u672c\u4e86\u3002\u5206\u6790\u5e08\u4e5f\u7acb\u5373\u6210\u4e3a\u5408\u4f19\u4eba\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The more he more he considered Shleifer\u2019s proposed bets, the more Coleman wanted to do them. But he still had to <strong>manage the liquidity risk<\/strong>\u2014the danger of holding unsellable positions using capital that could <strong>be withdrawn at short notice<\/strong>. In July 2003 he came up with a fix: he would set up a <strong>separate pool<\/strong> of capital to <strong>make private investments<\/strong>. The analytical <strong>techniques of hedge-fund investing<\/strong> would be married to the structure of a <strong>venture-style fund<\/strong>, with the limited partners locked in for long periods.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Coleman hoped to raise $75 million for Tiger\u2019s new private fund, but he met with resistance. \u201cTwentysomething white guys talking about the really interesting investments they had found in China&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;. we sounded completely nuts,\u201d Coleman said later. Everyone had war stories about Americans who went to China and got fleeced. Many were still scarred by the tech bust and leery of dot-com investing. But despite this skeptical reception, Coleman managed to<strong> raise $50 million<\/strong>. It was enough to close a few investments. It was not enough to close all five Chinese prospects, however. In a testament to the difference between venture thinking and the <strong>hedge-fund mindset<\/strong>, the one that Tiger chose to drop was Alibaba. Shleifer had negotiated a term sheet to buy 6.7 percent of the company for $20 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tiger\u7684\u8001\u677fColeman\u4e5f\u5f88\u5389\u5bb3\uff0c\u770b\u5230\u673a\u4f1a\u7684\u540c\u65f6\u4e5f\u5173\u6ce8\u5230\u4e86\u6d41\u52a8\u6027\u98ce\u9669\uff0c\u5bf9\u51b2\u57fa\u91d1\u662f\u53ef\u4ee5\u968f\u65f6\u8d4e\u56de\u7684\u3002\u4e8e\u662f\u8ba1\u5212\u8bbe\u7acb\u53ef\u4ee5\u6295\u79c1\u52df\u80a1\u6743\u7684\u57fa\u91d1\uff0c\u8ba1\u5212\u52df\u96c67500w\uff0c\u5b9e\u9645\u53ea\u52df\u96c6\u5230\u4e865000w\uff0c\u53ea\u591f\u62955\u4e2a\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Shleifer had discussed an investment with Neil Shen, the future Sequoia China boss who was then the finance chief at the online travel company Ctrip. The <strong>two had agreed on a valuation, and while Shen said later that the agreement was provisional, Shleifer had mentally banked it<\/strong>. A few weeks after he had left China, Shen called him in New York. <strong>SARS had ended, Ctrip\u2019s revenues had jumped, and Shen was now demanding a 50 percent increase in Ctrip\u2019s valuation<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u5f53\u5e74\u8001\u6c88\u6446Tiger\u8fd9\u9053\u5f88\u6709\u4ef7\u503c\uff0c\u4e00\u662f\u643a\u7a0b\u591a\u62ff\u4e86\u4e0d\u5c11\u94b1\uff0c\u4e8c\u662f\u540e\u6765\u9047\u5230\u738b\u5174\u7684\u5750\u5730\u8d77\u4ef7\u5c31\u5fc3\u7167\u4e0d\u5ba3\u4e86\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But by moving sideways from hedge-fund stock picking into private technology bets, Tiger had created the template for Milner\u2019s later Facebook investment. The <strong>Tiger tool kit <\/strong>featured the global tabulation of tech business segments, the modeling of earnings and fair value, and <strong>rapid intercontinental opportunism in response to a shock<\/strong>\u2014in Tiger\u2019s case, SARS; in Milner\u2019s case, the collapse of Lehman Brothers. Yet in order for Milner to learn from Tiger\u2019s template, he had to know of its existence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Over the first half of 2004, <strong>Tiger duly invested in Mail,<\/strong> Rambler, and Yandex. The following year, even as Shleifer began chasing \u201cthe this of the that\u201d in Latin America, the <strong>relationship with Milner deepened<\/strong>. <strong>Tiger became the first institutional backer of Milner\u2019s investment vehicle, Digital Sky Technologies<\/strong>. Through Milner, Tiger gained exposure to other Russian internet stocks, including VKontakte, the clone of Facebook. Through Tiger, conversely, Milner\u2019s eyes were opened to the possibility of investing globally. \u201cAll of a sudden this whole world opened to me,\u201d Milner said later. \u201c<strong>Tiger was an inspiration<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tiger\u662fYuri\u7684\u8001\u5e08\uff0c\u4e5f\u662fDST\u7684\u4e3b\u8981\u6295\u8d44\u4eba\uff0c\u96be\u5f97Yuri\u90a3\u4e48\u731b\uff0c\u8fd8\u662f\u8981\u6709\u9ad8\u4eba\u3002\u540d\u5e08\u51fa\u9ad8\u5f92\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;For his part, Paul Graham of Y Combinator preached that <strong>there was nothing much to learn<\/strong>. \u201cBuild something users love, and spend less than you make. How hard is that?\u201d he demanded. But Horowitz was acknowledging that <strong>even talented founders would have to suffer through a grueling learning period<\/strong>. The title of his compelling memoir\u2014The Hard Thing About Hard Things\u2014captured the trauma of entrepreneurship. At the same time, Andreessen and Horowitz would supply <strong>technical founders<\/strong> with the sort of Rolodex that a seasoned CEO would have\u2014<strong>connections to customers, suppliers, investors, and the media<\/strong>. Accel had differentiated itself by <strong>specializing in certain fields<\/strong>; Benchmark had pitched its \u201c<strong>better architecture\u201d of high fees and small funds<\/strong>; Founders Fund had pledged to <strong>back the most original and contrarian companies<\/strong>. For their part, Andreessen and Horowitz promised to smooth the <strong>learning curve for scientists<\/strong> who wanted to be chief executives.\u201cOur claim to fame is \u2018by entrepreneurs for entrepreneurs,\u2019\u201d he declared confidently.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u7845\u8c37\u7684\u5404\u5927\u6d3e\u522b\u5404\u6709\u4e0d\u540c\uff0cYC\u8ba4\u4e3a\u521b\u4e1a\u6ca1\u4ec0\u4e48\u597d\u5b66\u7684\uff0c\u53ef\u4ee5\u96c6\u4e2d\u57f9\u8bad\uff1bA16Z\u8ba4\u4e3a\u6280\u672f\u548c\u79d1\u5b66\u5bb6\u51fa\u8eab\u7684\u521b\u59cb\u4eba\u53d8\u6210\u4f01\u4e1a\u5bb6\u6709\u4e2a\u6bd4\u8f83\u8270\u96be\u7684\u5b66\u4e60\u66f2\u7ebf\uff0c\u4e8e\u662f\u63d0\u4f9b\u5404\u79cd\u652f\u6301\uff0c\u53f7\u79f0\u201c\u4ee5\u4f01\u4e1a\u5bb6\u652f\u6301\u4f01\u4e1a\u5bb6\u201d\uff1bAccel\u8fd8\u662f\u4e13\u4e1a\u57fa\u91d1\uff0c\u4fdd\u6301\u9886\u57df\u5185\u7684\u7edd\u5bf9\u4e13\u4e1a\u5ea6\uff1bFounders Fund\u8981\u627e\u6700\u539f\u521b\u548c\u7279\u522b\u7684\u521b\u59cb\u4eba\uff0cBechmark\u4fdd\u6301\u5c0f\u57fa\u91d1\u6a21\u5f0f\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In June 2009, the month after Milner closed his Facebook deal, a16z announced it had raised $300 million from investors. To make good on the promise of <strong>coaching founders<\/strong>, the partnership promised to recruit a much larger head count than other VC outfits. In the past, other VCs had hired <strong>\u201coperating partners\u201d who focused on helping portfolio companies <\/strong>rather than making investments, but Andreessen Horowitz aimed to build an<strong> extensive consultancy<\/strong> under its roof. There would be a team to help startups find office space, another to advise on publicity, and yet others to source key recruits or provide introductions to potential customers. Up to a point, this promise of coaching corresponded to the reality.  Often, the key interventions came not from the elaborately staffed consulting service but from Andreessen and Horowitz themselves. In the case of a next-generation networking startup called Nicira, for example, Horowitz saved the company from two extremely costly errors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u6295\u540e\u518d\u591a\u518d\u6df1\uff0c\u6700\u6838\u5fc3\u7684\u6295\u540e\u8fd8\u662f\u6765\u81ea\u57fa\u91d1\u521b\u59cb\u4eba\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Too much of a tough attitude would cause further defections, Horowitz answered. The priority for now was to keep the engineers in place while Okta fixed its real problem: its sales strategy. The startup had been trying to sell its secure dashboard to small companies. <strong>But small companies generally don\u2019t care about network security.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u6218\u7565\u7ea0\u504f\uff0c\u4e0d\u8981\u628a\u4ea7\u54c1\u5356\u7ed9\u4e0d\u9700\u8981\u7684\u5ba2\u6237\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Soon after it got going, in September 2009, Andreessen Horowitz plunked down <strong>$50 million<\/strong> for a stake in the breakout telephony company Skype, which by now was owned by eBay. The bet amounted to fully one-sixth of a16z\u2019s first fund, <strong>yet it had little to do with its promise to coach green technical founders<\/strong>. After all, Skype was already six years old; it had no shortage of sophistication. Instead, the Skype deal had everything to do with Andreessen\u2019s recent exposure to Milner and to his privileged position at the heart of the Valley network. Andreessen\u2019s Skype coup was followed by other <strong>Milner-style growth deals.<\/strong> Using the capital in its first fund, a16z also invested alongside DST in the gaming company Zynga and staked $20 million on the mobile app Foursquare. Its second fund, a war chest of $650 million, made a pair of <strong>$80 million bets on Facebook and Twitter<\/strong>; a $40 million bet on Groupon; and a pair of $30 million bets on the picture-sharing app Pinterest and the real estate rental platform Airbnb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VC\u8fd8\u662f\u8981\u7075\u6d3b\uff0c\u5373\u4fbfA16Z\u53cd\u590d\u8bb2\u81ea\u5df1\u600e\u4e48\u5e2e\u52a9\u4f01\u4e1a\u5bb6\uff0c\u6295\u540e\u7684\u610f\u4e49\uff0c\u4f46\u6700\u5927\u7684\u4e00\u7b14\u94b1\u8fd8\u662f\u76f4\u63a5\u6295\u7ed9\u4e86Skype\uff0c\u4e00\u5bb6\u4e0d\u9700\u8981\u4ec0\u4e48\u6295\u540e\u7684\u516c\u53f8\uff0c\u53bb\u505a\u4e86\u6210\u957f\u9636\u6bb5\u7684\u6295\u8d44\u3002\u5e76\u4e14\u5728\u6210\u957f\u6027\u6295\u8d44\u7684\u8def\u4e0a\u8d8a\u8d70\u8d8a\u8fdc\uff0c\u6ca1\u6709\u505c\u4e0b\u6765\u7ea0\u504f\u7684\u610f\u601d\uff0c\u5176\u5b9e\u8fd9\u5c31\u662f\u6700\u597d\u7684\u7b56\u7565\u3002\u65e9\u671f\u548c\u6210\u957f\u671f\u8981\u5e73\u8861\u597d\uff0c\u6838\u5fc3\u8fd8\u662f\u6293\u4f4f\u673a\u4f1a\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For a venture partnership that had advertised itself as <strong>an early-stage startup doctor<\/strong>, committing more than <strong>a third of a fund\u2019s capital to growth deals <\/strong>was off brand. But this surprising pivot was a testimony to the influence of one man. \u201cWe made a bet that this expansion-stage opportunity had arisen,\u201d Andreessen said later. \u201cA lot of this had to do with Yuri Milner.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As a16z hired <strong>additional investing partners<\/strong>, following its proud rule that <strong>all must have an entrepreneurial background,<\/strong> it found that some did not work out: <strong>being a founder is not the same as being able to pick which founders to invest in<\/strong>. In 2018, a16z elevated a non-entrepreneur to the rank of general partner for the first time. \u201cIt\u2019s a kind of a big thing for especially me to eat crow on,\u201d Horowitz admitted to Forbes. \u201cIt took probably longer than it should\u2019ve to change it, but we changed it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A16Z\u5728\u6210\u957f\u6027\u6295\u8d44\u4e0a\u8d8a\u8d70\u8d8a\u8fdc\uff0c\u4e5f\u8d8a\u6765\u8d8a\u597d\u4e86\uff0c\u589e\u52a0\u4e86\u65b0\u5408\u4f19\u4eba\uff0c\u4e5f\u4e0d\u518d\u8981\u6c42\u5fc5\u987b\u4f01\u4e1a\u5bb6\u80cc\u666f\u4e86\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The VC firms that launch with a splash tend to have two things in common. <strong>They have a story about their special approach<\/strong>, and <strong>they have recognizable partners with strong networks<\/strong>. In a few exceptional instances, the <strong>special approach<\/strong> is powerful enough to explain most of the success. Such was the case with Yuri Milner, who arrived in the Valley with no connections and vaulted straight to the top. Such was the case with Tiger Global, which improvised the hedge fund\/venture hybrid model. And such was more or less the case with Y Combinator, whose batch-based seed investing was genuinely novel. But in the large majority of examples,<strong> new venture firms succeed because of the founders\u2019 experience and status<\/strong>, <strong>not because of the claimed originality of their methods<\/strong>. Academic research confirms what is intuitively obvious: success in venture capital owes much to <strong>connections<\/strong>.\u201cSilicon Valley is <strong>gripped by the cult of the individual<\/strong>, But those individuals represent the <strong>triumph of the network<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u6210\u529f\u7684VC\u673a\u6784\u6709\u4e24\u4e2a\u4e8b\u6bd4\u8f83\u5171\u901a\uff0c\u4e00\u4e2a\u662f\u8bb2\u81ea\u5df1\u7279\u522b\u7684\u5b9a\u4f4d\u6216\u65b9\u6cd5\u8bba\uff0c\u53e6\u4e00\u4e2a\u662f\u9760\u5408\u4f19\u4eba\u80fd\u529b\u548c\u8fde\u63a5\u3002Tiger\u3001Yuri\u3001YC\u53ef\u4ee5\u8bb2\u5b9a\u4f4d\u548c\u7279\u522b\u7684\u65b9\u6cd5\u8bba\uff0c\u4f46\u66f4\u591a\u7684\u662f\u9760\u5408\u4f19\u4eba\u7684\u8fde\u63a5\u80fd\u529b\u3002\u8fd9\u5c31\u662fVC\u7684\u672c\u8d28<\/strong>\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"13-king-sequoia\">13 King Sequoia <\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Its ownership group featured Bob Kagle, the Benchmark partner who had invested in eBay, and Mark Stevens, a longtime stalwart at Sequoia. Its regular fans included Ben Horowitz and Ron Conway. And this fusing of sports and technology finance operated in two ways:<strong> the venture capitalists rooted for the Warriors<\/strong>, and <strong>the Warriors became venture capitalists<\/strong>. Kevin Durant, the team\u2019s star forward, assembled a portfolio of some forty startups, ranging from LimeBike to Postmates. Andre Iguodala, the defensive specialist, built a similar empire, while a retired Warrior, David Lee, was recruited by a VC partnership.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u4f01\u4e1a\u5bb6\u548cVC\u6295\u8d44\u4eba\u89d2\u8272\u4e4b\u95f4\uff0c\u5f80\u5f80\u662f\u53ef\u4ee5\u7075\u6d3b\u8f6c\u6362\u7684\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The venture partnership that best embodied this boom was Sequoia Capital. Through the 1980s and 1990s, Sequoia and Kleiner had been the top two Valley firms, and in some ways they were similar: partnerships with a<strong> focus on networking, software, and the internet<\/strong>, with <strong>turbo-power-law rainmakers. <\/strong>Early in the first decade of the twenty-first century, when John Doerr was at the peak of his celebrity and <strong>Sequoia was on the wrong side of the youth revolt<\/strong>, Kleiner appeared stronger. But around the middle of the decade, the tables turned, and Kleiner and Sequoia began to look like opposites. Where Kleiner charged into cleantech, Sequoia approached cautiously. Where Kleiner led on recruiting women, Sequoia followed woefully late but then implemented the shift less clumsily. Where Doerr parted with Vinod Khosla and other members of his team, <strong>Michael Moritz remained bonded to Doug Leone<\/strong>, who provided the engineering savvy and ability to read people that complemented Moritz\u2019s grand strategy. And where Doerr hired established, fifty-something celebrities, Sequoia had no interest in recruiting comfortable executives who, as Moritz put it, \u201chad been <strong>too successful, had lost some spring in their step, were not hungry enough<\/strong>, had too many outside commitments and, most of all, were not prepared to become rookies again.\u201d The contrast in approach generated an astonishing contrast in performance. In 2021, when Kleiner partners had all but disappeared from the Forbes Midas list, Sequoia occupied the number one and number two slots, and three of the top ten, making it by far and away the top firm in the industry.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sequoia\u548cKPCB\u4e00\u5ea6\u662f\u7845\u8c37\u7684\u53cc\u5b50\u661f\uff0c80\/90\u5e74\u4ee3\u768420\u5e74\u95f4\u6301\u7eed\u5173\u6ce8\u5728\u7f51\u7edc\u3001\u8f6f\u4ef6\u548c\u4e92\u8054\u7f51\u4e0a\uff0c\u6295\u51fa\u4e86\u6574\u4e2a\u65f6\u4ee3\uff1b\u4f46\u8fdb\u516521\u4e16\u7eaa\u90fd\u9047\u5230\u4e9b\u95ee\u9898\uff0cSequoia\u88ab\u5e74\u8f7b\u7684\u521b\u59cb\u4eba\u523b\u610f\u56de\u907f\uff0cKP\u5230\u4e86\u9876\u70b9\uff0c\u770b\u8d77\u6765\u66f4\u5f3a\u4e00\u4e9b\uff1b\u5341\u5e74\u4e4b\u540e\u5c31\u5f7b\u5e95\u53cd\u8f6c\u4e86\uff0cKP\u5168\u529b\u6295\u5165\u5230\u6e05\u6d01\u6280\u672f\uff0cSequoia\u8ddf\u4e86\u4e00\u9635\u5f00\u59cb\u8f6c\u5176\u4ed6\u65b9\u5411\uff0c\u6536\u83b7\u4e86\u65b0\u7684\u65f6\u4ee3\u3002\u7528\u4eba\u4e0a\u4e5f\u7686\u7136\u76f8\u53cd\u8d77\u6765\uff0cDoerr\u548cKhosla\u5206\u624b\uff0cMoritz\u548cLeone\u6301\u7eed\u642d\u6863\uff1bKP\u4e0d\u65ad\u62db50\u5c81\u5de6\u53f3\u7684\u77e5\u540d\u4eba\u58eb\u52a0\u76df\uff0cMoritz\u4fdd\u6301\u62db\u5e74\u8f7b\u4eba\uff0c\u8ba4\u4e3a\u592a\u6210\u529f\u7684\u4eba\u7f3a\u4e4f\u9965\u997f\u611f\uff0c\u6700\u7ec8\u4eca\u5929\u6765\u770b\uff0c\u5df2\u7ecf\u5730\u4f4d\u76f8\u5f53\u4e0d\u540c\u4e86\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sequoia\u2019s secret sauce began with the union between <strong>Moritz and Leone<\/strong>, the <strong>most successful buddy <\/strong>act in the history of venture capital. <strong>Moritz was strategic, and Leone was operational<\/strong>. Moritz enforced discipline, and Leone enjoyed conversations at the watercooler. Moritz had admired \u201cthe purposeful cadence of a relentless, disciplined march\u201d\u2014the stamina and willpower that patiently built success, one advance upon another.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Moritz\u548cLeone\u7684\u53cc\u5b50\u661f\u7ec4\u5408\uff0c\u957f\u671f\u7d27\u5bc6\u914d\u5408\u3001\u9ad8\u5ea6\u4e92\u8865\u5bf9\u4e8e\u6210\u529f\u6781\u4e3a\u5173\u952e\u3002Moritz\u5584\u4e8e\u6218\u7565\u6027\u601d\u8003\uff0c\u6267\u884c\u7eaa\u5f8b\uff0c\u5d07\u5c1a\u76ee\u6807\u660e\u786e\u3001\u6309\u7eaa\u5f8b\u7a33\u6b65\u524d\u8fdb\uff0c\u901a\u8fc7\u8010\u5fc3\u548c\u610f\u5fd7\u6784\u67b6\u4e00\u4e2a\u53c8\u4e00\u4e2a\u7684\u6210\u529f\uff1bLeone\u66f4\u52a0\u52a1\u5b9e\u53c2\u4e0e\u5b9e\u9645\u8fd0\u8425\uff0c\u80fd\u591f\u901a\u8fc7\u6c9f\u901a\u53ca\u65f6\u5239\u8f66\uff0c\u4e0d\u5141\u8bb8\u5458\u5de5\u4e0d\u80fd\u5168\u5fc3\u6295\u5165\u3002\u60f3\u8d85\u8d8a\u5e73\u5eb8\uff0c\u9996\u5148\u8981\u7cbe\u795e\u4e0a\u5148\u505a\u5230\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Stamina<\/strong> was just the start of the Sequoia formula. Moritz and Leone focused uncompromisingly on the <strong>culture of the firm<\/strong>: external investment hits would flow from an<strong> internal quest for excellence<\/strong>. Moritz once enumerated the challenges that this entailed: \u201crecruitment, team building, setting of standards, questions of inspiration and motivation, <strong>avoiding complacency<\/strong>, the arrival of new competitors and the continual need to refresh ourselves and <strong>purge under-performers.<\/strong>\u201d From this long list, <strong>team building and the development of young talent were particular priorities.<\/strong> Sequoia believed in \u201c<strong>nurturing the unknown, the homegrown, and what becomes the next generation<\/strong>,\u201d as Moritz put it. Of course, this was a fair description of what Accel had done by training Kevin Efrusy. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sequoia\u7684\u6210\u529f\u79bb\u4e0d\u5f00Moritz\u5bf9\u6587\u5316\u7684\u6253\u9020\uff0c\u8010\u529b\u7b2c\u4e00\uff0c\u5185\u90e8\u8ffd\u6c42\u5353\u8d8a\u6765\u6536\u83b7\u6210\u529f\uff0c\u901a\u8fc7\u62db\u8058\u3001\u56e2\u5efa\u3001\u8bbe\u5b9a\u9ad8\u6807\u51c6\u3001\u4e92\u76f8\u6fc0\u52b1\u548c\u5e26\u6765\u7075\u611f\u3001\u907f\u514d\u81ea\u6ee1\u60c5\u7eea\u3001\u4e0d\u65ad\u66f4\u65b0\u81ea\u5df1\u7684\u505a\u6cd5\u3001\u53ca\u65f6\u6e05\u9664\u7ee9\u6548\u5dee\u7684\u8868\u73b0\u8005\u3002\u4e0d\u65ad\u5730\u57f9\u517b\u4e0b\u4e00\u4ee3\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The story of <strong>Roelof Botha<\/strong> illustrated the Moritz-Leone approach to talent development. Sequoia hired Botha from his position as PayPal\u2019s <strong>chief financial officer in 2003<\/strong>; it was a canny way of forging links with a go-getting cohort of PayPal alums, who were not otherwise well-disposed toward the partnership. Beyond his PayPal connections, the South African\u2013born Botha was a natural Sequoia hire: he had been top of his class at Stanford Business School and had the <strong>drive of an immigrant<\/strong>. But he was <strong>not yet thirty<\/strong> and had <strong>no experience as an investor<\/strong>, so the firm\u2019s senior partners made it their mission to develop him. Of course, if he foundered, they would push him out as clinically as they closed a weak startup, sending him on his way with an airtight nondisclosure agreement. But their vehement intention was to help him put points on the board: to make him a Sequoia warrior.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Unsuccessful startups generally fail faster than good ones succeed, so demoralizing losses materialize before the winners. The first time Botha had to report that one of his companies was a zero, <strong>he teared up at the partners\u2019 meeting<\/strong>: normally, he was composed and certain of his judgment; failure was acutely painful. Then, three years into his tenure, Botha shifted from anguish to elation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Roelof\u6700\u8fd1\u63a5\u4e86Leone\u9000\u4f11\u7684\u73ed\uff0c\u6210\u4e3aSequoia\u7ee7Von\u3001Moritz&amp;Leone\u4e4b\u540e\u7684\u7b2c\u4e09\u4ee3\u63a5\u73ed\u4eba\u4e86\u3002\u4ed6\u7684\u6545\u4e8b\u4e5f\u975e\u5e38\u5177\u5907\u4ee3\u8868\u6027\uff0c2003\u5e74\u662fPaypal\u7684CFO\uff0c\u88ab\u62db\u8fdb\u6765\uff1a\u65af\u5766\u798f\u6bd5\u4e1a\u3001\u6709\u521d\u4ee3\u79fb\u6c11\u7684\u5185\u9a71\u529b\u3001\u4e0d\u5230\u4e09\u5341\u5c81\u3001\u6295\u8d44\u7ecf\u9a8c\u662f\u767d\u7eb8\uff0c\u5bf9\u4ed6\u91cd\u70b9\u57f9\u517b\uff0c\u5b9a\u671f\u6d3e\u5b83\u53bb\u5173\u95ed\u4e00\u95f4\u4e0d\u6210\u529f\u7684\u4f01\u4e1a\uff0c\u8def\u4e0a\u8ba9\u4ed6\u7b7e\u4e86\u4fdd\u5bc6\u534f\u8bae\uff0c\u4f46\u662f\u8fd9\u4e00\u5207\u90fd\u662f\u4e3a\u4e86\u8ba9\u4ed6\u65e9\u65e5\u6210\u4e3a\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u7ebf\u6218\u58eb\u3002\u70c2\u4f01\u4e1a\u603b\u662f\u6b7b\u7684\u66f4\u5feb\uff0c\u4e8f\u635f\u5148\u5151\u73b0\uff0c\u4ed6\u7684\u9879\u76ee\u7b2c\u4e00\u6b21\u4e8f\u6210\u96f6\u8ba9\u4ed6\u611f\u53d7\u5230\u5207\u5b9e\u7684\u75db\u82e6\uff0c\u5408\u4f19\u4eba\u4f1a\u8bae\u4e0a\u5927\u54ed\u3002\u4e09\u5e74\u5c31\u4ece\u8fd9\u79cd\u75db\u82e6\u8d70\u5411\u4e00\u4e2a\u4e2a\u6536\u83b7\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u5931\u8d25\u540e\u7684\u53cd\u601d\u80fd\u5230\u54ed\u7684\u7a0b\u5ea6\uff0c\u6211\u8fd8\u6ca1\u6709\u8fc7\uff0c\u8fd9\u771f\u662f\u975e\u5e38\u4eba\u6240\u80fd\u53ca\u554a\u3002\u7528\u60c5\u81f3\u6df1\uff0c\u5bf9\u5de5\u4f5c\u7684\u8ba4\u771f\u81f3\u6df1\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Despite Sequoia\u2019s<strong> cerebral and disciplined culture<\/strong>, the firm\u2019s team-building efforts included a <strong>surprisingly soft side<\/strong>. Partnership off-sites began with something called \u201ccheck-ins\u201d: colleagues opened up to one another about <strong>marital tensions<\/strong>, <strong>insecurities at work<\/strong>, or a <strong>sickness in the family<\/strong>. \u201cIf you\u2019re willing to expose yourself and nobody takes advantage of it, it creates a <strong>trusting atmosphere<\/strong>,\u201d Doug Leone reflected. The off-sites also featured <strong>poker tournaments<\/strong>: Partners competed for the \u201cDon Valentine tartan,\u201d a monstrously garish red, yellow, and black jacket. At one retreat, during an intensely muddy game of flag football, Botha allowed his South African childhood to seize control of his instincts. He barreled toward a muscular opponent and felled him with a rugby-style tackle. \u201cIt was one of the moments that unlatched our friendship,\u201d Botha remembered later. The team building extended to the way that Sequoia celebrated its successes. When a portfolio company achieved a <strong>profitable exit<\/strong>, the newspapers would profile the named partner on the board, as though venture were a lone-wolf business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u56e2\u5efa\u662f\u6587\u5316\u7684\u5f88\u91cd\u8981\u7ec4\u6210\u90e8\u5206\uff0c\u4e5f\u662f\u5de5\u4f5c\u6587\u5316\u7684\u8865\u5145\u3002\u5de5\u4f5c\u4e0a\u8981\u7406\u667a\u3001\u7eaa\u5f8b\u4e25\u660e\uff0c\u56e2\u5efa\u8981\u8ba9\u56e2\u961f\u611f\u5230\u56e2\u7ed3\u548c\u4e92\u4fe1\uff0c\u6bd4\u8f83\u6e29\u6696\uff0c\u5206\u4eab\u4e2a\u4eba\u548c\u5bb6\u5ead\u7684\u6210\u957f\uff0c\u6251\u514b\u8d5b\u7b49\uff0c\u975e\u5e38\u6709\u7528\u3002\u56e2\u5efa\u7684\u76ee\u7684\u662f\u5efa\u7acb\u4fe1\u4efb\u3002&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Because of Sequoia\u2019s status as the Valley\u2019s leading venture firm, most startup founders were eager to pitch to it; by the partnership\u2019s own reckoning, it was invited to consider around<strong> two-thirds of the deals<\/strong> <strong>that ended up getting funded by the top two dozen venture shops<\/strong>. But this <strong>privileged deal flow was both a blessing and a curse<\/strong>. The partners\u2019 days were crammed with meetings organized at the visitors\u2019 request. It was easy to <strong>become reactive<\/strong>.To manage this danger, <strong>Goetz brought Accel\u2019s prepared-mind approach to Sequoia, leading the partners in mapping out tech trends and anticipating which sorts of startups would prosper from them<\/strong>. He was early to sketch out a detailed picture of the mobile internet landscape, laying out the base stations that phone carriers would have to build, the chips that would go into the handsets, and the software that would run on them. <strong>Another prepared-mind \u201clandscape\u201d showed the shift of data from customer devices to the cloud<\/strong>, anticipating the new hardware configurations, software business models, and security vulnerabilities that would flow from it. Yet a third landscape focused on the rise of the developer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u7845\u8c372\/3\u7684\u9879\u76ee\u662f\u88ab\u524d20\u5bb6\u673a\u6784\u5728\u6c34\u4e0b\u5c31\u62ff\u4e0b\u7684\uff0c\u4f46\u8fd9\u79cd\u72ec\u7279\u7684\u9879\u76ee\u5b89\u6392\u65e2\u6709\u597d\u5904\u4e5f\u6709\u574f\u5904\u3002\u6700\u5927\u7684\u574f\u5904\u5c31\u662f\u4f1a\u6162\u6162\u53d8\u6210\u53cd\u5e94\u6027\u7684\uff0c\u5e94\u5bf9\u8fd9\u4e9b\u627e\u4e0a\u95e8\u7684\u9879\u76ee\uff0c\u7f3a\u4e4f\u4e3b\u52a8\u6027\u3002Goetz\u501f\u9274\u4e86Accel\u7684\u65b9\u6cd5\u5f00\u59cb\u901a\u8fc7\u7814\u7a76\u8d8b\u52bf\u6784\u5efa\u201c\u672a\u6765\u7684\u6295\u8d44\u5730\u56fe\u201d\uff0c\u627e\u5230\u673a\u4f1a\u70b9\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While Goetz led on the prepared mind, Botha pioneered the <strong>application of behavioral science<\/strong> to venture capital. This was a radical idea, and Botha\u2019s colleagues came to regard it as transformative for Sequoia. At other venture partnerships, investors often boasted about relying on instinct. They claimed to have \u201c<strong>pattern recognition<\/strong>,\u201d an <strong>investment sixth sense<\/strong>; \u201cI\u2019ve had this my entire career, and I do not know why,\u201d one successful VC said happily. He set out to apply the<strong> resulting insights<\/strong> to Sequoia\u2019s Monday partners\u2019 meetings. The goal, at a minimum, was to make the investment process consistent from one week to the next. \u201cSometimes we felt that if a particular company had been there the previous Monday, or the subsequent Monday, our decision would have been different,\u201d Botha explained. \u201cThat didn\u2019t feel like a recipe for sustainable success.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Botha\u2019s focus on behavioral science grew partly out of the premature sale of YouTube. In accepting Google\u2019s acquisition offer, the <strong>founders had behaved precisely as behavioral experiments predict<\/strong>: people are <strong>often willing to gamble in order to avoid a loss, but they are irrationally risk averse when it comes to reaching for the upside<\/strong>. Examining the pattern of Sequoia\u2019s exits, Botha determined that <strong>premature profit-taking occurred repeatedly at the firm<\/strong>, despite Moritz\u2019s earlier efforts to extend the partnership\u2019s holding periods. The behavioral literature also drew attention to another tendency that Botha observed: <strong>VCs suffered from \u201cconfirmation bias,\u201d<\/strong> the practice of filtering out information that challenges a position you have taken. At Sequoia, the partners sometimes <strong>missed attractive Series B <\/strong>deals because they wanted to make themselves feel good. They hated to admit they had been wrong in saying no to the same startup at the Series A stage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Botha\u628a\u884c\u4e3a\u5fc3\u7406\u5b66\u5f15\u5165\u4e86\u6295\u8d44\u51b3\u7b56\u8fc7\u7a0b\u4e2d\u3002\u5f88\u591a\u673a\u6784\u7684\u6295\u8d44\u4e3b\u8981\u4f9d\u8d56\u76f4\u89c9\uff0c\u5f62\u6210\u6a21\u5f0f\u8bc6\u522b\u7b49\u65b9\u6cd5\u8bba\u3002\u5728Youtube\u7b49\u9879\u76ee\u51fa\u552e\u65f6\u4f1a\u53d1\u73b0\u5927\u5bb6\u5728\u9762\u5bf9\u4e8f\u635f\u65f6\u5e94\u8be5\u98ce\u9669\u89c4\u907f\u5374\u66f4\u613f\u610f\u8d4c\u4e00\u628a\u8d62\u56de\u6765\uff0c\u4f46\u9762\u5bf9\u5229\u6da6\u65f6\u5374\u4e0d\u7406\u6027\u5730\u98ce\u9669\u89c4\u907f\u66f4\u613f\u610f\u65e9\u65e5\u83b7\u5229\u4e86\u7ed3\u7684\u5fc3\u7406\u504f\u5dee\uff0c\u867d\u7136\u516c\u53f8\u5e0c\u671b\u591a\u6301\u6709\u4e00\u9635\u5b50\uff0c\u8fd8\u662f\u4e0d\u65ad\u5730\u5356\u65e9\u4e86\uff0c\u53cd\u590d\u51fa\u73b0\u3002\u786e\u8ba4\u504f\u5dee\u4e5f\u7ecf\u5e38\u51fa\u73b0\uff0c\u7ecf\u5e38\u4f1a\u9519\u8fc7\u5f88\u597d\u7684B\u8f6e\u6295\u8d44\u673a\u4f1a\uff0c\u4ec5\u4ec5\u662f\u4e0d\u60f3\u627f\u8ba4A\u8f6e\u65f6\u81ea\u5df1\u770b\u8d70\u773c\u4e86\u3002\u8fd9\u4e2a\u8fd8\u662f\u6ee1\u6df1\u523b\u7684\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The first step toward overcoming cognitive bias is to recognize it. Botha arranged for <strong>outside psychologists <\/strong>to present to the partnership. He led his colleagues through<strong> painful postmortems of past decisions<\/strong>, homing in on times when they had weighed evidence irrationally. Previously, <strong>the partners had tried to extract lessons from portfolio companies that had failed<\/strong>. Now Botha was equally <strong>focused on the times when Sequoia had declined to invest in a startup that subsequently succeeded<\/strong>. To enable scientific postmortems, the partners <strong>kept a record of all votes<\/strong> at investment meetings. \u201cIt\u2019s not about scapegoating,\u201d Botha explained. \u201cIt\u2019s just \u2018What did we learn as a team?\u2019 If we can get better at decisions, that is a source of advantage.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u5f15\u5165\u5fc3\u7406\u5b66\u5bb6\uff0c\u5206\u6790\u8fc7\u5f80\u5931\u8d25\u7684\u6559\u8bad\uff0c\u5206\u6790\u6bcf\u6b21\u9519\u8fc7\u7684\u539f\u56e0\uff0c\u662f\u4e00\u6761\u75db\u82e6\u4f46\u4e00\u5b9a\u901a\u5411\u5149\u660e\u7684\u8def\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As well as running postmortems, Botha began to build <strong>new habits<\/strong> into real-time decision making. To <strong>overcome the risk-aversion<\/strong> identified by decision science, the partners included a \u201c<strong>pre-parade\u201d section<\/strong> in each investment memo\u2014a description of <strong>how the company would turn out assuming everything went perfectly<\/strong>. By building this exercise into their process, the partners gave themselves permission to voice their excitement about a deal, and to do so with a fullness that would otherwise have been uncomfortable. \u201c<strong>We all suffer from the desire not to be embarrassed<\/strong>,\u201d Jim Goetz reflected. \u201cBut we\u2019re<strong> in the business of being embarrassed<\/strong>, and <strong>we need to be comfortable enough to say out loud what might be possibl<\/strong>e.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u8fd9\u4e2a\u5c06\u514b\u670d\u51b3\u7b56\u65f6\u76f8\u6c42\u5b89\u7a33\u3001\u4e0d\u7406\u6027\u7684\u98ce\u9669\u89c4\u907f\u7684\u4e60\u60ef\u6539\u8d77\u6765\u633a\u96be\u7684\uff0c\u4f46\u53ef\u4ee5\u5c1d\u8bd5\uff0c\u5728Memo\u52a0\u4e0a\u5982\u679c\u4e00\u5207\u987a\u5229\u7684\u8bdd\uff0c\u8fd9\u4e2a\u516c\u53f8\u80fd\u505a\u6210\u4ec0\u4e48\u6837\u3002\u901a\u5e38\u8fd9\u79cd\u60f3\u8c61\u4e0d\u88ab\u63a5\u53d7\uff0c\u5bb9\u6613\u88ab\u73b0\u5b9e\u6253\u8138\uff0c\u4f46\u5176\u5b9eVC\u8fd9\u79cd\u5e38\u5e38\u88ab\u6253\u8138\u7684\u751f\u610f\uff0c\u53cd\u800c\u66f4\u9700\u8981\u8fd9\u6837\u7684\u60f3\u8c61\uff0c\u624d\u80fd\u8fbe\u5230\u672a\u6765\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sequoia also began to design around the problem of \u201canchoring\u201d\u2014that is, <strong>basing a judgment on other people\u2019s views<\/strong> rather than <strong>wrestling with the evidence and taking an independent position<\/strong>.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ahead of a decision, each of them would read the investment memo with an <strong>unpolluted mind<\/strong>; they should <strong>do their utmost to avoid groupthink<\/strong>. Then they would come to the Monday meeting prepared to take a stand. \u201cWe don\u2019t want passive \u201cdo it if you want,\u2019\u201d Leone said. \u201cThe sponsor needs help. It\u2019s a very lonely place to be the lead on an investment.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u907f\u514d\u951a\u5b9a\u3001\u907f\u514d\u4e92\u76f8\u5728\u51b3\u7b56\u4e0a\u7684\u5e72\u6270\u3002\u8fd9\u4e9b\u7ec6\u8282\u80fd\u505a\u5230\u4f4d\uff0c\u96be\u602a\u80fd\u4fdd\u6301\u9ad8\u6548\u7684\u6b63\u786e\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2010, acting on an idea from Moritz, Botha began to build Sequoia\u2019s \u201c<strong>scouts program<\/strong>,\u201d an inspired variation on the<strong> idea of angel investing<\/strong>. The insight was that most angel investors were yesterday\u2019s leaders. They had cashed out from their startups; they had money to play with; but their understanding of the business landscape was dated. Meanwhile, <strong>active entrepreneurs had their wealth tied up in their firms, so they lacked the ready cash to make angel investments.<\/strong> With the advent of growth investing, this was becoming more of a problem, because entrepreneurs were delaying the moment when they took their gains out of their companies. \u201cYou\u2019re Drew Houston in 2012 and you\u2019re worth $100 million but you can\u2019t make rent, never mind have the luxury of investing in other companies,\u201d Botha explained, using the example of one of Dropbox\u2019s two founders. So Botha and his partners came up with a fix. \u201cWe give you $100,000 to invest. We <strong>take half of the gains<\/strong>, but you as the scout get to keep the rest.\u201dOf course, the effect of this arrangement was to generate investment leads for Sequoia. Today\u2019s top entrepreneurs were identifying the brightest stars in the next cohort.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u8fd9\u4e2a\u65b0\u5947\u7684\u8ba1\u5212\u8fd8\u771f\u662f\u6709\u8da3\uff0c\u627e\u5e74\u8f7b\u7684\u521b\u59cb\u4eba\u6765\u505a\u5929\u4f7f\u6295\u8d44\uff0c\u4ee5\u6b64\u53d1\u73b0\u597d\u9879\u76ee\uff0c\u771f\u662f\u7edd\u4e86\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sequoia\u2019s <strong>tight team <\/strong>and <strong>loose experiments<\/strong> illuminated the enigmatic skill in venture capital. Taken individually, the story of every venture bet can seem to hinge on serendipity. Investor receives random referral. Investor meets inspired young misfit. Investor manages to connect with youth by means of an opaque alchemy. Explaining this bonding process, Yahoo\u2019s Jerry Yang had remarked mysteriously that Michael Moritz \u201chad soul,\u201d But despite these trivializing explanations, Sequoia illustrates the method behind the seeming arbitrariness and chance. The best venture capitalists <strong>consciously create their luck<\/strong>. <strong>They work systematically to boost the odds that serendipity will strike repeatedly<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u7d27\u5bc6\u7684\u56e2\u961f\u548c\u770b\u4f3c\u677e\u6563\u7684\u56e2\u5efa\u7b49\u5b9e\u9a8c\u76f8\u7ed3\u5408\u521b\u9020\u4e86\u6301\u7eed\u7684\u597d\u8fd0\u6c14\uff1b\u6301\u7eed\u6210\u529f\u662f\u6709\u65b9\u6cd5\u7684\uff0c\u4e0d\u9760\u8fd0\u6c14\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As part of his focus on proactivity, Goetz had conceived a system he called \u201cearly bird\u201d: seeing in the advent of the Apple App Store a trove of useful investment leads, Sequoia had written code that tracked downloads by consumers in sixty different countries.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u65e9\u9e1f\uff0c\u901a\u8fc7\u8ddf\u8e2aApp Store\u7684\u4e0b\u8f7d\u6570\u636e\u6765\u53d1\u73b0\u65b0\u673a\u4f1a\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The same double story\u2014<strong>serendipity on the surface, systematic effort deeper down<\/strong>\u2014could be told of other Sequoia winners. In the spring of 2009, for example, a Sequoia partner named Greg McAdoo dropped by the Y Combinator building and struck up a conversation with Paul Graham. What type of startup might survive the post-financial-crisis slowdown? he wondered. Graham said something about <strong>startups with \u201cintellectual toughness\u201d<\/strong> and nodded toward a team of youths huddled over a laptop on one of YC\u2019s long tables. <strong>McAdoo duly approached them and wowed them with his understanding of their business model<\/strong>, and <strong>the result was an investment in the real estate rental platform Airbnb<\/strong>, which ultimately generated a multibillion-dollar jackpot for Sequoia. Told like this, the Airbnb story makes the venture business <strong>sound absurdly casual<\/strong>, with the payoff wildly disproportionate to skill. But the <strong>deeper truth is that McAdoo\u2019s visit to the YC building was not at all casual<\/strong>. He was there because Sequoia had deliberately made itself the incubator\u2019s primary ally, investing in multiple YC graduates and providing capital for YC\u2019s own seed fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u4e0d\u5c11\u6210\u529f\u9879\u76ee\u7684\u6295\u8d44\u770b\u4f3c\u51d1\u5de7\uff0c\u4f46\u6df1\u5165\u770b\u5176\u5b9e\u662f\u7cfb\u7edf\u6027\u7684\u52aa\u529b\u5bfc\u81f4\uff0c\u4e0d\u662f\u5076\u7136\u3002Greg\u53bbYC\u8bf7\u6559\u4ec0\u4e48\u6837\u7684\u516c\u53f8\u80fd\u5728\u91d1\u878d\u5371\u673a\u540e\u6d3b\u4e0b\u6765\uff0cPaul\u89e3\u91ca\u4e86\uff0c\u8fd8\u7ed9\u4e86\u4e2a\u5355\u5b50\uff0c\u6700\u7ec8\u6295\u4e86AirBnB\uff0c\u770b\u4f3c\u5076\u7136\u3002\u4f46\u5b9e\u9645\u662fGreg\u975e\u5e38\u8ba4\u771f\u5730\u548c\u6bcf\u4e00\u5bb6\u8c08\u4e86\u4e4b\u540e\u624d\u5206\u6790\u51fa\u6765\u7684\u7ed3\u679c\uff0c\u524d\u63d0\u8fd8\u662fSequoia\u5df2\u7ecf\u6295\u4e86\u4e0d\u5c11YC\u7684\u4f01\u4e1a\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But by far the greatest triumph of the scouts program was Sequoia\u2019s investment in the payments startup Stripe. Here was the ultimate example of Sequoia <strong>deliberately creating the circumstances<\/strong> in which fortune might strike. <strong>If \u201cmanufactured serendipity\u201d could be said to exist, Sequoia was the master of it<\/strong>. Sequoia was the biggest player in Stripe\u2019s seed round and provided nearly all the money in the Series A; alone among the investors, Moritz took a Stripe board seat. By 2021, Stripe was valued at $95 billion, and Sequoia\u2019s stake was worth $15 billion and rising.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u523b\u610f\u521b\u9020\u5de7\u5408\u7684\u5927\u5e08\u3002\u5076\u7136\u5de7\u5408\u80cc\u540e\u7684\u5fc5\u7136\uff0c\u662f\u9700\u8981\u4ed8\u51fa\u5de8\u5927\u52aa\u529b\u7684\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Thanks to the Stripe bet and many others, Sequoia dominated the venture business even as the field became more crowded. Taking all its U.S. venture investments between 2000 and 2014, the partnership generated an extraordinary multiple of <strong>11.5x \u201cnet\u201d<\/strong>\u2014that is, after subtracting management fees and its share of the investment profits. In contrast, the weighted average for venture funds in this period was <strong>less than 2x net<\/strong>. Nor was Sequoia\u2019s achievement driven by a couple of outlandish flukes: if you took the top three performers out of the sample, Sequoia\u2019s U.S. venture multiple still weighed in at a formidable 6.1x net. <strong>Deploying the capital it raised in 2003, 2007, and 2010, Sequoia placed a grand total of 155 U.S. venture bets. Of these, a remarkable 20 generated a net multiple of more than 10x and a profit of at least $100 million<\/strong>. The consistency across time, sectors, and investing partners was striking. \u201cWe\u2019ve hired more than 200 outside money managers since I came here in 1989,\u201d marveled the investment chief at a major university endowment. \u201cSequoia has been our number one performer by far.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sequoia\u7684\u8868\u73b0\u592a\u597d\u4e86\uff0c155\u4e2a\u9879\u76ee\u51fa\u73b020\u4e2a10x\u4ee5\u4e0a\u56de\u62a5\u3002\u540c\u4e1a\u5e73\u5747\u4e0d\u52302.0x\uff0c\u4ed6\u4eec\u80fd\u505a\u523011.5x<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Singh set out to rescue Sequoia\u2019s experimental Asia bet with further sub-experiments. Acknowledging that there was<strong> little tradition of entrepreneurship<\/strong> in India, he recognized that startup founders <strong>needed extra help<\/strong>. Following the a16z model, he <strong>hired operational consultants<\/strong> to advise startups on sales, marketing, and recruitment, gradually building a team of more than <strong>thirty people<\/strong>; given that Sequoia Capital\u2019s Sand Hill Road headquarters had an investment staff of around two dozen and a total head count of seventy-five, this was a sizable expansion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u5370\u5ea6\u7684\u505a\u6cd5\u4e0d\u540c\u4e8e\u7f8e\u56fd\uff0c\u53d1\u73b0\u4e3b\u8981\u95ee\u9898\u662f\u7f3a\u4e4f\u6709\u7ecf\u9a8c\u7684\u4f01\u4e1a\u5bb6\uff0c\u4e8e\u662f\u5f00\u59cb\u6309Hands on\u7684\u65b9\u5f0fi\u6765\u505a\uff0c\u6210\u7acb30\u4e2a\u4eba\u7684\u5927\u89c4\u6a21\u7684\u6295\u540e\u56e2\u961f\uff0c\u56e0\u5730\u5236\u5b9c\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At home in its traditional market, Sequoia experimented with new kinds of investments. Ever since the Yahoo experience with Masayoshi Son, Moritz and Leone had eyed the growth-equity business, determined to avoid being outmuscled by kingmakers with larger checkbooks. In 1999 they duly raised a war chest of $350 million and made a series of big bets on the internet darlings of the era. In 2000 the Nasdaq crashed and Sequoia\u2019s fund was down $80 million that year and $65 million the next, at one point losing as much as<strong> two-thirds of its value<\/strong>.The disaster was compounded by Sequoia\u2019s inexperience in evaluating growth deals. Incumbent venture partners managed the fund; there had been no thought of hiring a <strong>dedicated team of growth specialists<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u6210\u957f\u6027\u6295\u8d44\u5e76\u4e0d\u6bd4\u65e9\u671f\u6295\u8d44\u66f4\u5bb9\u6613\uff0c\u4e8c\u8005\u4e5f\u5b8c\u5168\u4e0d\u4e00\u6837\u3002\u9996\u671f\u6210\u957f\u57fa\u91d1\u9047\u5230\u6ce1\u6cab\u7834\u88c2\u8dcc\u53bb\u4e862\/3\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They had been trained to invest in <strong>obscure companies<\/strong> that had never taken venture capital\u2014that had \u201cbootstrapped.\u201d Most of these bootstrappers were located outside Silicon Valley, and some had no connection to technology; Summit stayed away from flashy deals, preferring unappreciated bargains. The way the Summit people sourced investments spoke volumes about their mechanical style. They sat in the office cold-calling companies that fitted their spec. Then <strong>they extrapolated revenues and costs to arrive at a forecast of earnings, finally applying a standard multiple to figure out the companies\u2019 fair value<\/strong>. Before going ahead with an investment, the Summit people demanded a good price. Their <strong>return target for each position was 3x<\/strong>. Overpaying could turn a solid bet into a pointless one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u8fd9\u6bb5\u6545\u4e8b\u4e5f\u5f88\u6709\u610f\u601d\uff0c\u4ed6\u4eec\u4e00\u5ea6\u96c7\u4f63\u4e86Summit\u7684\u56e2\u961f\u4e13\u95e8\u6311\u90a3\u4e9b\u6ca1\u62ff\u8fc7VC\u94b1\u7684\u6210\u719f\u7684\u516c\u53f8\u6765\u6295\u8d44\uff0c\u76ee\u68073\u500d\u56de\u62a5\uff0c\u4e3b\u8981\u9760\u8d22\u52a1\u57fa\u7840\u7b97P\/E\uff0c\u9879\u76ee\u6765\u6e90\u53ef\u4ee5cold call\u3002\u7a33\u624e\u7a33\u6253\uff0c\u4e5f\u8d5a\u4e0d\u4e86\u5927\u94b1\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ServiceNow delivered the first ever $1 billion gain on a Sequoia growth position.For the young Pat Grady, it was a vindication. In 2015 he would become co-lead of Sequoia\u2019s growth business; in that familiar pattern, the unknown and homegrown had been promoted. For the rest of the ex-Summit crowd, it was the reverse. As Moritz had put it, <strong>one of the tasks of venture leaders is to purge underperformers<\/strong>: one by one, the <strong>other ex-Summiteers left the partnership<\/strong>. Meanwhile for Sequoia, the ServiceNow experience proved that it had finally succeeded in forging a distinctive growth style, <strong>fusing the quantitative methods of the Summit tradition with the risk appetite and activism that came naturally to venture capitalists<\/strong>. As of early 2021, Sequoia\u2019s growth funds raised in 2009, 2011, and 2014 were showing returns of around 30 percent per year, \u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u7b2c\u4e00\u4e2a\u6210\u957f\u671f\u6295\u8d44\u768410\u4ebf\u56de\u62a5\u9879\u76ee\uff0cPat\u88ab\u63d0\u5347\u4e3a\u8d1f\u8d23\u4eba\uff0c\u5176\u4ed6\u4e1a\u7ee9\u4e0d\u4f73\u7684\u4eba\u5fc5\u987b\u79bb\u5f00\uff0cPat\u628aSummit\u7684\u91cf\u5316\u5206\u6790\u65b9\u6cd5\u548c\u98ce\u9669\u504f\u597d\u76f8\u7ed3\u5408\uff0c\u6210\u957f\u6027\u6295\u8d44\u8fde\u7eed\u4fdd\u630130%\u7684\u6536\u76ca\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2008, Sequoia performed a <strong>reverse-Tiger shift<\/strong>: having focused throughout its history on private investments, it <strong>advanced into the hedge-fund arena<\/strong>. The idea came from Jim Goetz, and the plan was to <strong>extend the firm\u2019s bets on the best tech startups beyond their IPOs<\/strong>: Why let other investors capture the gains from the mature phase of these companies? After all, <strong>tech-focused hedge funds<\/strong> were increasingly sidling up to Sequoia for advice; evidently, Sequoia\u2019s insights could be translated into public-market profits.Moreover, by setting up a hedge fund, Sequoia would acquire an additional tool. Rather than just backing the winners from digital disruption, it could profit by \u201cshorting\u201d the losers\u2014that is, by betting on falls in their stock prices. For example, the advent of the iPhone spelled the eclipse of the predecessor device the BlackBerry. Sequoia would therefore short BlackBerry\u2019s creator, Research in Motion, as well as being long the companies that stood to profit from the coming mobile internet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u548cTiger\u76f8\u53cd\uff0c\u4eceVC\u8fdb\u5165\u5bf9\u51b2\u57fa\u91d1\u9886\u57df\uff01<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Now Sequoia Capital Global Equities, as the hedge fund was called, <strong>experienced a 100 percent rejection rate from fifty external investors<\/strong>. On top of that, one of Sequoia\u2019s hedge-fund hires quickly defected. Gritting their teeth, the partners launched the fund in 2009 with $50 million of their own personal savings, most of which came from Moritz and Leone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u9996\u671f\u5bf9\u51b2\u57fa\u91d1\u88ab50\u4e2a\u5916\u90e8\u6295\u8d44\u4eba100%\u62d2\u7edd\uff01M&amp;L\u521b\u59cb\u4eba\u81ea\u638f\u8170\u5305\u6210\u7acb\u7b2c\u4e00\u671f\uff01<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By the beginning of 2021, Sequoia Capital Global Equities had $10 billion under management. It was an extraordinary rise: in just over a decade, it had grown its assets two-hundred-fold. In the four years since the change of leadership, the fund\u2019s returns had <strong>averaged 34.5 percent<\/strong> per year, double the performance of the S&amp;P 500 and among the best in the hedge-fund industry.The experiment was so successful that Sequoia China launched its own hedge fund. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u7ea2\u6749\u4e2d\u56fd\u5c45\u7136\u4e5f\u6709\u4e8c\u7ea7\u4e1a\u52a1\u4e86\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Henceforth, his team would simply look for great investments, and these could come from anywhere: the scope of the challenge was infinite. The <strong>Heritage fund<\/strong> would have to decide whether this was the time to buy Brazilian land, or Chinese tech, or stakes in hedge funds engaged in litigation in Argentina. <strong>Every potential investment would have to be evaluated relative to all others<\/strong>, so Johnson would have to recruit exceptionally versatile colleagues\u2014\u201c<strong>a team capable of comparing, in a very thoughtful and debate-oriented way, apples versus oranges<\/strong>.\u201d&nbsp;Moritz and Leone pledged $150 million each to Johnson\u2019s plan, and together they set out to raise more from outside investors. But, much as with the hedge fund, <strong>Sequoia suffered rejection<\/strong>. After visiting potential investors all over the world, the team returned home with far less than it had hoped: about $250 million of external capital.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u9057\u4ea7\u57fa\u91d1\u4e1a\u52a1\uff0c\u4ece\u6240\u6709\u9879\u76ee\u4e2d\u6bd4\u8f83\u9009\u62e9\u6700\u597d\u7684\u90a3\u4e2a\uff0c\u518d\u6b21\u88ab\u62d2\u7edd\uff0c\u8fd8\u662f\u52df\u96c6\u4e86\u4e00\u4e9b\u3002\u5f00\u59cb\u90fd\u4e0d\u5bb9\u6613\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2010, Heritage began to make investments. It chose areas as obvious as private equity and hedge funds, but also niches as esoteric as a direct stake in a chain of emergency veterinary clinics. Because it believed in <strong>actively choosing investments<\/strong> rather than spreading capital among silos, it made far <strong>more concentrated bets<\/strong> than other endowments, retaining only one-third as many outside managers. Likewise, because it had abolished silos, Heritage could move capital between strategies nimbly; there was no quota that had to be deployed in commodities or Asia or some other bucket. Between 2013 and 2015, much of the fund\u2019s gains came from public markets and real estate. Then, for the next three years, the big contributors were energy and hedge funds. Next, from 2018, late-stage technology bets drove the performance. By 2020, Heritage\u2019s assets under management had shot up to around $8 billion, and it boasted a better one-, three-, and five-year record than any U.S. endowment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u4e00\u5982\u65e2\u5f80\u7684\u4f18\u79c0\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By 2020, Tiger Global was managing an astonishing $40 billion worth of assets, and Lone Pine and Coatue, two other offshoots of Julian Robertson\u2019s Tiger Management, vied to compete with it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Coatue \u548cLone Pine\u5c45\u7136\u662fTiger\u7684\u5b66\u751f\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"14-unicorns\">14 Unicorns<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Theranos was a vindication for VCs because almost none of the money that Holmes raised came from Sand Hill Road practitioners<\/strong>. She had pitched a venture partnership named MedVenture, which specialized in medical devices. The meeting had ended with Holmes leaving abruptly, unable to answer the investors\u2019 questions. Holmes also approached Tim Draper, the venture capitalist who had tried and failed to get into Yahoo. Draper made an angel bet because of a family connection, but it was modest. Tiring of skeptical professionals, Holmes raised the vast bulk of the capital from billionaire Valley outsiders. The Walton family of Walmart fame invested $150 million. The media baron Rupert Murdoch invested $121 million. The DeVos family (retail) and the Cox family (media) ventured $100 million each. Mexico\u2019s Carlos Slim, the Greek American heir Andreas Dracopoulos, and South Africa\u2019s Oppenheimer family kicked in $85 million between them. <strong>The comforting lesson, from Sand Hill Road\u2019s perspective, was that amateurs had failed. The pros had stayed out of it.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Theranos\u5c45\u7136\u6d17\u767d\u4e86\u7845\u8c37VC\uff0c\u96c6\u4f53\u6ca1\u6709\u53c2\u4e0e\uff0c\u591a\u4e48\u5f3a\u7684\u7eaa\u5f8b\u6027\u554a\uff01\u53cd\u800c\u662f\u5927\u5bb6\u65cf\u4eec\u4e0d\u9547\u5b9a\u4e86\u3002\u5145\u5206\u8bf4\u660e\u4e86VC\u8fd8\u662f\u4e2a\u4e13\u4e1a\u6d3b\uff0c\u4e1a\u4f59\u7684\u5149\u6709\u94b1\u4e0d\u884c\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Along the way, however, something fundamental had been changing. After Benchmark led WeWork\u2019s Series A and a partnership called DAG Ventures led the Series B, the next three funding rounds brought in mutual-fund houses and investment banks. The bankers in particular were in tension with the VCs. Their goal was not just to make investments that increased in value but to establish lucrative relationships. The tension between the venture capitalists and the relationship bankers surfaced in October 2014, when WeWork raised one of its funding rounds. On the board call to approve the financing, WeWork\u2019s existing investors were informed that as part of the deal Neumann\u2019s shares in the company would <strong>acquire super-voting rights<\/strong>: each founder share would now confer the right to ten votes, giving Neumann the power to outmuscle the investors who were supposedly overseeing him. As a responsible venture capitalist, <strong>Bruce Dunlevie opposed this move: if the founder veered off track, Benchmark would need the votes to force a change<\/strong>\u2014just as a16z had done with Zenefits. At the same time, however, Dunlevie didn\u2019t want to block the financing: WeWork needed the capital. Balancing these considerations, Dunlevie registered his opposition politely, arguing that super-voting rights were a mistake not only for investors but for Neumann himself. \u201c<strong>Absolute power corrupts absolutely<\/strong>,\u201d he reminded his fellow board directors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u521b\u59cb\u4eba\u548cVC\u7684\u5173\u7cfb\u7d27\u5f20\uff0c\u8d85\u7ea7\u6295\u7968\u6743\u662f\u539f\u56e0\u4e4b\u4e00\uff0cWeWork\u4e0aBenchmark\u6295\u4e86\u53cd\u5bf9\u7968\uff0c\u5341\u5206\u4e0d\u6613\u554a\u3002\u56fd\u5185\u8fd1\u5e74\u628a\u8fd9\u4ef6\u4e8b\u5f53\u6210\u987a\u7406\u6210\u7ae0\u7684\u4e8b\u60c5\uff0c\u4e0d\u5e94\u8be5\u554a\u3002\u8001\u5e08\u4eec\u90fd\u6ca1\u6709\u8fd9\u4e48\u653e\u6d6a\u5f62\u9ab8\u5462\uff0c\u6240\u4ee5\u6700\u62c5\u5fc3\u7684\u5c31\u662f\u5b66\u751f\u7167\u732b\u753b\u864e\uff0c\u6ca1\u5b66\u5230\u7cbe\u9ad3\uff0c\u628a\u7cdf\u7c95\u90fd\u7528\u4e0a\u4e86\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Gurley\u2019s investment in Uber was the perfect model of an intelligent Series A bet. Before joining Benchmark, he had been struck by the writings of Brian Arthur, a Stanford professor who studied network businesses. <strong>Companies that enjoyed network effects inverted a basic microeconomic law: rather than facing diminishing marginal returns, they faced increasing ones<\/strong>. In most normal sectors, producers that supplied more of something would see prices fall: abundance meant cheapness. <strong>In network businesses, contrariwise, the consumer experience improved as the network expanded<\/strong>, so <strong>producers could charge extra for their products<\/strong>. Moreover, the improving consumer experience was matched by falling production costs because of the economies of scale in building a network. As Benchmark had discovered when it had backed eBay, the rewards could be enormous.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bill\u53d1\u73b0\u4e86\u7f51\u7edc\u6548\u5e94\u5e26\u6765\u7684\u4ef7\u503c\u9012\u589e\u3001\u6da8\u4ef7\u6f5c\u529b\u548c\u9012\u589e\u7684\u6bdb\u5229\uff0c\u679c\u65ad\u7684\u6295\u8d44\u5230\u4e86Uber\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The next day Benchmark presented a term sheet to Kalanick, and after a bit of back-and-forth the partners led Uber\u2019s Series A round, <strong>paying $12 million for one-fifth of the equity<\/strong>. Gurley had landed his OpenTable for black cars. His ambition for the startup was that it might match OpenTable in its results, going public in due course at a valuation of perhaps $2 billion. But soon Marc Andreessen signaled that a16z might be ready to value Uber at somewhere <strong>around $300 million<\/strong>. It was five times more than Benchmark had paid, less than a year earlier. Satisfied with a16z\u2019s proposed valuation, Kalanick called Pishevar to say that he would not be taking Menlo\u2019s money. But then history swerved in an unexpected direction. Andreessen backed off the $300 million valuation that Kalanick thought he had promised. Over dinner with Kalanick,<strong> the VC declared that Uber\u2019s customer numbers and revenues made the valuation too rich. He cut his offer by a quarter.<\/strong> Kalanick tried to persuade Andreessen to meet him halfway. Andreessen wasn\u2019t budging. A few days later, Kalanick accepted the reduced price and left for a tech conference in Ireland. The valuation still bothered him. He emailed Andreessen again, asking for a better deal, something between the original $300 million and the $220 million that a16z was now offering. But Andreessen refused to shift position. Kalanick fumed. Then he phoned Pishevar.When he got back to his hotel, <strong>Pishevar sent Kalanick a text, valuing Uber at $290 million<\/strong>. It was almost 30 percent more than a16z\u2019s reduced offer. This time Kalanick got back to him immediately. The $290 million offer had been fine; he was happy to take it. \u201cDone. Bring it in,\u201d Kalanick instructed. <strong>Pishevar printed out a term sheet and took it to Kalanick\u2019s hotel room, where the two men signed it. When the due diligence was done, Menlo Ventures duly invested $25 million at the $290 million valuation, taking 8 percent of the company<\/strong>. Bezos, Goldman, and a few other investors kicked in a further $12 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With the unfair benefit of hindsight, the Pishevar investment was a premonition of the troubles in Uber\u2019s future. Kalanick had decided that money was power and that expert venture-capital guidance was dispensable. Fittingly, despite the substantial size of his investment, Pishevar became a nonvoting board observer rather than a full Uber director: he had not been chosen for his ability to provide oversight, so observer status seemed appropriate. Rather, <strong>Pishevar\u2019s chief function at Uber would be to serve as cheerleader<\/strong>. He shaved the company logo into his hair. He arranged for the rapper Jay-Z to invest. <strong>He threw a party featuring a musician who became Kalanick\u2019s girlfriend<\/strong>. Thanks to Google, Facebook and the youth revolt, a patina of founder-friendliness had become almost mandatory for VCs, but Pishevar pushed this fashion to the max, <strong>serving as buddy and valet<\/strong>. Once, when Kalanick flew into Los Angeles, Pishevar sent a car to meet him at the airport. In the back was a fresh suit for Kalanick to change into.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Benckmark\u76841200w\u6295\u8d44\u4e4b\u540e\uff0c\u76ee\u680720\u4ebf\u7684\u4f30\u503c\uff0c\u670930x\u7684\u7a7a\u95f4\u3002\u4f46\u4e00\u5e74\u4e0d\u5230\uff0c\u5c31\u7ffb\u4e865\u500d\uff0c\u88abA16Z\u8ba1\u5212\u63093\u4ebf\u6295\u8d44\u3002\u53ea\u662f\u5176\u6700\u540e\u4e34\u65f6\u780d\u4ef725%\u7ed9\u4e86Menlo\u673a\u4f1a\uff0cPishevar\u518d\u6b21\u626e\u6f14\u4e86Accel\u5f53\u5e74\u5728Facebook\u524d\u7684\u89d2\u8272\uff0c\u679c\u65ad\u8865\u4f4d\uff0c\u6309\u71672.9\u4ebf\u62ff\u4e0bB\u8f6e\u9886\u6295\uff0c\u8d5a\u7ffb\u4e86\u3002\u5927\u673a\u4f1a\u9762\u524d\u7edd\u5bf9\u4e0d\u80fd\u7ea0\u96c6\u4ef7\u683c\uff0c\u9519\u8fc7\u7684\u6210\u672c\u592a\u9ad8\u4e86\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the first half of 2013, Hailo raised a Series B of $31 million and prepared to launch in New York City.[50] For its part, Lyft raised a $15 million round led by Peter Thiel\u2019s Founders Fund and then a $60 million round led by a16z, which by now regretted missing out on Uber. But the good news, from Benchmark\u2019s perspective, was that Uber remained comfortably ahead; if this was a winner-takes-all competition, bring it on, because Uber was the likely winner. In August 2013, Kalanick trumpeted his dominance by raising a crushing $258 million Series C round, which was led by the prestigious venture arm of Google. As if to emphasize his front-runner status, Kalanick also arranged for the private-equity giant TPG to come in on the deal. A clause in the closing documents gave TPG an option to invest an additional $88 million at some point in the next six months. It was a warning to rivals: Uber could out-blitzscale anyone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yet even as its value boomed, Uber was charting its version of the worrying shift that occurred simultaneously at WeWork. Slowly and steadily, Kalanick was consolidating his power at the expense of his investors. In addition to denying Pishevar a voting directorship, he had used his Series B round to take board rights away from an angel backer who had crossed him. In the Series C round in 2013, Kalanick had followed up by <strong>arranging super-voting power for himself, his cofounders, and his early investors,<\/strong> with the result that the large amounts of capital provided by Series C and D backers did not translate into large leverage. <strong>As a matter of principle, Benchmark hadn\u2019t liked this, just as it didn\u2019t like WeWork\u2019s embrace of super-voting rights a year later. But Benchmark itself got super-voting rights on its Series A shares, and with Uber poised to be the biggest win in the partnership\u2019s history, Gurley was not going to rock the boat on behalf of the later investors. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Uber\u540e\u9762\u867d\u7136\u987a\u5229\uff0c\u4f46C\u8f6e\u8981\u8d85\u7ea7\u6295\u7968\u6743\u8fd8\u662f\u906d\u9047Benchmark\u7684\u5426\u51b3\uff0c\u6700\u540eBenchmark\u4e5f\u6709\u8d85\u7ea7\u6295\u7968\u6743\u4e86\u3002\u8fd9\u770b\u4f3c\u7b80\u5355\u8fc7\u5206\u7684\u8981\u6c42\uff0c\u5b9e\u5219\u6700\u540e\u7531\u6b64\u633d\u6551\u4e86Uber\u3002\u6240\u4ee5\u8fd8\u662f\u8981\u6709\u7eaa\u5f8b\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Gurley\u2019s essay pointed out three problems. First, <strong>unicorns were overvalued<\/strong>, and unlike other Valley investors Gurley was prepared to say so. Late-stage tech investment rounds had become \u201cthe most competitive, the most crowded, and the frothiest,\u201d he announced bluntly. The new money pressing into the Valley explained why this was so. The assorted tech novices\u2014banks, mutual-fund houses, PE firms, and hedge funds\u2014had little interest in allocating $10 million to a startup. Rather, they wanted to write $100 million checks that might move the needle on their multibillion-dollar portfolios. Inexperienced money therefore crowded into big-ticket late-stage rounds, driving valuations skyward. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>When Kalanick refused to pay attention, Gurley accepted invitations to speak to MBA classes, using these occasions to generate debate on his predicament. If the bright-eyed business students found themselves on the board of a recalcitrant unicorn, what would they do? Gurley discovered that none of them could say. \u201cThe only answer we could think of was that the <strong>public markets would do a better job of holding companies accountable<\/strong>,\u201d he lamented.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The truth is that <strong>standard venture capitalists were not the main villains<\/strong>: not at WeWork, not at Uber, and not at overmighty unicorns more generally. Between 2014 and 2016, more than three-quarters of late-stage venture funding in the United States came from <strong>nontraditional investors such as mutual funds, hedge funds, and sovereign wealth fund<\/strong>s.But that didn\u2019t change the fact that the venture industry confronted a challenge: <strong>unicorn governance was broken<\/strong>. In his anguished essay of 2015, Gurley had pointed to the clearest fix: <strong>that unicorns should go public<\/strong>. A public listing would get rid of those distortive liquidation preferences that encouraged unicorn recklessness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bill\u5f88\u65e9\u53d1\u73b0\u4e86\u72ec\u89d2\u517d\u8fc7\u9ad8\u4f30\u503c\u80cc\u540e\u7684\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u7ba1\u6cbb\u5d29\u5feb\uff0c\u9700\u8981IPO\u4e0a\u5e02\u6210\u4e3a\u516c\u4f17\u516c\u53f8\u6765\u63a5\u53d7\u76d1\u7ba1\uff0c\u51e0\u4e4e\u662f\u552f\u4e00\u7684\u51fa\u8def\u4e86\u3002\u53ef\u60dc\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\uff0c\u5728\u56fd\u5185\uff0c\u516c\u4f17\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u6cbb\u7406\u95ee\u9898\u4e5f\u5f88\u591a\uff0c\u66f4\u52a0\u4efb\u91cd\u9053\u8fdc\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The rush of IPOs was an encouraging sign, but it was marred by the emergence of a device called a SPAC\u2014a form of public listing that sidestepped the scrutiny and disclosure involved in a traditional IPO process.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SPAC\u662f\u5e2e\u52a9\u4f01\u4e1a\u9003\u907f\u76d1\u7ba1\u7684IPO\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"15\">15 <\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>To a surprising degree, Salganik concluded, blockbusters are random. For star venture capitalists, of course, this verdict encourages humility. Because of the<strong> feedback effects in a power-law business<\/strong>, some venture capitalists will dominate the sector, raising the lion\u2019s share of the dollars, getting the best access to the hot deals, and generating the best performance. \u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2018, a working paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research tested this logic directly on the venture industry. Sure enough, the authors confirmed the <strong>existence of feedback effects. <\/strong>Early hits for venture firms boost the odds of later hits: <strong>each additional IPO among a VC firm\u2019s first ten investments predicts a 1.6 percentage point higher IPO rate for subsequent investments<\/strong>. After testing various hypotheses, the authors conclude that <strong>success leads to success because of reputational effects<\/strong>. Thanks to one or two initial hits, a <strong>VC\u2019s brand becomes strong enough to win access to attractive deals<\/strong>, particularly late-stage ones, where a startup is already doing well and the investment is less risky. Moreover, those one or two initial hits seem not to reflect skill. Rather, they result from \u201cbeing in the right place at the right time\u201d\u2014in other words, from good fortune. \u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u5e42\u5f8b\u5b9a\u5f8b\u7684\u53cd\u9988\u6548\u5e94\u8ba9VC\u673a\u6784\u66f4\u52a0\u670d\u4ece\u5e42\u5f8b\u5206\u5e03\uff0c\u65e9\u671f\u7684\u6210\u529f\u5e26\u6765\u58f0\u8a89\uff0c\u58f0\u8a89\u5e26\u6765\u66f4\u591a\u673a\u4f1a\u548c\u66f4\u591a\u7684\u6210\u529f\uff0c\u8fd9\u4e48\u770bPR\u548c\u4e1a\u7ee9\u90fd\u975e\u5e38\u6709\u4ef7\u503c\uff0c\u4f46\u4e3b\u8981\u8fd8\u662f\u4e1a\u7ee9\u8bf4\u660e\u95ee\u9898\u4e86\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>the existence of path dependency does not actually prove that skill is absent. Venture capitalists need skill to enter the game: <strong>path dependency can only influence which among the many skilled players gets to be the winner<\/strong>. The second reason to believe in skill lies in the origin story of some partnerships. Occasionally a newcomer breaks into the venture elite in such a way that skill obviously does matter.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u6280\u80fd\u548c\u8def\u5f84\u4f9d\u8d56\u90fd\u6709\u4f5c\u7528\u3002\u8def\u5f84\u4f9d\u8d56\u5e2e\u52a9\u6709\u6280\u80fd\u7684\u6295\u8d44\u4eba\u66f4\u52a0\u6210\u529f\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Third, the idea that <strong>venture capitalists get into deals on the strength of their brands can be exaggerated<\/strong>. A deal seen by a partner at Sequoia will also be seen by rivals at other firms: in a fragmented cottage industry, there is no lack of competition. Often, <strong>winning the deal depends on skill as much as brand<\/strong>: it\u2019s about <strong>understanding the business model well enough to impress the entrepreneur<\/strong>; it\u2019s about <strong>judging what valuation might be reasonable<\/strong>. One careful tally concluded that <strong>new or emerging venture partnerships capture around half the gains in the top deals<\/strong>, and there are myriad examples of famous VCs having a chance to invest and then flubbing it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u673a\u6784\u54c1\u724c\u5bf9\u4e8e\u6295\u8fdb\u53bb\u597d\u9879\u76ee\u7684\u5e2e\u52a9\u6ca1\u90a3\u4e48\u5927\uff0c\u66f4\u52a0\u6838\u5fc3\u7684\u8fd8\u662fVC\u7684\u6280\u80fd\uff0c\u80fd\u5426\u5f88\u597d\u7406\u89e3\u5546\u4e1a\u6a21\u5f0f\u548c\u7ed9\u51fa\u5408\u9002\u7684\u4f30\u503c\u3002\u6570\u636e\u663e\u793a\u65b0\u673a\u6784\u80fd\u6293\u4f4f\u5e02\u573a\u4e0a\u4e00\u534a\u5de6\u53f3\u7684\u597d\u9879\u76ee\uff0c\u53ef\u4ee5\u4e86\uff0c\u90a3\u5c31\u662f\u8001\u673a\u6784\u4eec\u770b\u8d70\u773c\u7684\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As the story of Sixto Rodriguez tells us, <strong>early luck and path dependency are at play in power-law businesses<\/strong>. Of course, venture capital is no exception, and sometimes it is better to be lucky than smart: think of Anthony Montagu, the toothbrush-wielding Briton who snagged a slice of Apple. But <strong>smartness is still a major driver of results<\/strong>, as are other qualities that VCs bring to the job: <strong>hustle<\/strong>, for getting to standoffish founders first;<strong> fortitude<\/strong>, for riding through the inevitable dark periods when your investment goes to zero; <strong>emotional intelligence<\/strong>, for encouraging and guiding talented but unruly founders. <strong>Great venture capitalists can turn themselves into instruments for modulating entrepreneurial mood swings<\/strong>. When things go well at a portfolio company, they ask the searching questions that keep complacency from setting in. When things go wrong, they rally the team and refresh its commitment to the mission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u65e9\u671f\u7684\u6210\u529f\u548c\u8def\u5f84\u4f9d\u8d56\u5bf9\u6536\u83b7\u5e42\u5f8b\u5206\u5e03\u5f88\u6709\u5e2e\u52a9\uff0c\u806a\u660e\u4e5f\u5f88\u91cd\u8981\uff0c\u8fd8\u6709\u9ad8\u6548\u6267\u884c\/\u7740\u6025\u3001\u575a\u97e7\u3001\u60c5\u7eea\u7a33\u5b9a\u90fd\u5f88\u91cd\u8981\u3002\u597d\u7684VC\u6295\u8d44\u4eba\u80fd\u628a\u81ea\u5df1\u53d8\u6210\u71a8\u5e73\u521b\u59cb\u4eba\u60c5\u7eea\u6ce2\u52a8\u7684\u5de5\u5177\uff0c\u505a\u597d\u4e92\u8865\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the first decades of the industry, VCs financed <strong>capital-intensive projects<\/strong> by writing appropriate term sheets. For their patience and ample cash, they demanded a<strong> large share<\/strong> of portfolio companies. In the 1960s, Davis &amp; Rock expected to own around <strong>45 percent<\/strong> of any startup it backed. In the 1970s and 1980s, Series A investors typically expected around <strong>a third of the equity<\/strong>. Then, in the late 1990s, the share fell further: Sequoia and Kleiner Perkins pumped a large sum into Google but took only <strong>a quarter <\/strong>of the company between them. Finally, at the nadir, Accel got just an<strong> eighth<\/strong> of Facebook when it backed Zuckerberg in 2005, a share that Arthur Rock would have found derisory. This shift to ever smaller stakes followed from the assertiveness of young startup founders, as we have seen. But it also reflected the fact that <strong>software startups required limited capital and promised quick and astronomical rewards<\/strong>: no wonder venture capitalists were content to own a modest share of them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VC\u53d1\u5c55\u7684\u8d8b\u52bf\u4e4b\u4e00\u5c31\u662f\u65e9\u671fVC\u7684\u5360\u80a1\u6bd4\u4f8b\u8d8a\u6765\u8d8a\u4f4e\u4e86\uff0c\u4ece\u63a7\u80a1\u52301\/10\u4ee5\u4e0b\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2007 a partnership called Lux Capital raised its first fund with an explicit mandate to avoid the obvious stuff. \u201cNo internet, social media, mobile, video games\u2014things that everybody will keep doing,\u201d as its co-founder Josh Wolfe explained it. Instead, Lux invested in areas such as<strong> medical robotics, satellites, and nuclear-waste treatment<\/strong>, and the results serve to prove that these capital-intensive challenges are not beyond the reach of venture capital. As of 2020, Lux boasted strong returns and managed $2.5 billion of investments. In the first half of 2021, nine Lux portfolio companies staged successful exits, and the partnership raised an additional $1.5 billion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LUX\u662f\u4e2a\u5f02\u7c7b\uff0c\u4e0d\u6295\u4e92\u8054\u7f51\uff0c\u4e13\u6295\u786c\u79d1\u6280\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For another illustration of how capital-intensive technologies can be venture-backable, consider <strong>Flagship Pioneering<\/strong>. A Boston-based venture operation focusing on ambitious medical breakthroughs, Flagship proved the point that high-risk, high-cost moon shots can pay off if the VC owns enough of the upside. <strong>Flagship incubated startups internally and eliminated the white-hot risks before seeking capital from other firm<\/strong>s. As a result, Flagship usually retained around <strong>half of the equity<\/strong> when its successful projects went public, with the result that the firm\u2019s limited partners reaped exceptional profits.One Flagship startup, the biotech company Moderna, invented a vaccine for COVID-19. There could scarcely be a stronger proof of venture capital\u2019s utility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Flagship\u57fa\u672c\u662f\u5f53\u5e74Hands-on\u6d3e\u7684\u624b\u827a\uff0c\u6536\u76ca\u76f8\u5f53\u53ef\u4ee5\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One last point about blitzscaling is worth noting. The goal of the blitzscaler is to establish market power\u2014something approaching monopoly. <strong>This can harm society in three ways: overmighty companies may underpay suppliers and workers, overcharge consumers, and stifle innovation<\/strong>. But the right answer to this problem<strong> is to regulate monopolies when they arise, not punish venture capital<\/strong>. After all, venture capital is all about <strong>disrupting entrenched corporate power: it is the enemy of monopoly.&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VC\u662f\u901a\u8fc7\u7834\u574f\u6027\u521b\u65b0\u7684\u652f\u6301\u6765\u53cd\u5784\u65ad\u7684\uff0c\u5784\u65ad\u9700\u8981\u88ab\u76d1\u7ba1\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Underscoring venture capital\u2019s advantage in financing the industries of tomorrow, venture hubs have grown outside the United States. Between 2009 and 2018, four of the top ten cities for VC investment were elsewhere: <strong>Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen<\/strong>, and London.[42] Promising VC clusters have emerged in Israel, Southeast Asia, and India.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u6211\u8f88\u6709\u5e78\u8eab\u5728\u5176\u4e2d\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With the United States and China in a competitive mood, and with the technology gap narrowing, the old win-win assumptions demand reexamination. Because of its disproportionate contribution to economic growth and innovation, <strong>venture capital has become a pillar of national power<\/strong>; it cannot be left out of geopolitical calculations. Looking back with the benefit of hindsight, U.S. venture capitalists\u2019 role in building China\u2019s technology sector benefited China more than the United States: <strong>the U.S. investors earned money, but China gained strategic industries<\/strong>. This China advantage is clearest where U.S. venture capital helped to develop Chinese technologies with military potential.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>China is a military competitor bent on siphoning intellectual property out of other advanced economies. USA has no choice but to defend its commercial and strategic interests: <strong>restricting inbound Chinese VC<\/strong> and vigorously protecting U.S. intellectual property are legitimate ways to go about this.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u4e2d\u7f8e\u7684\u957f\u671f\u7ade\u4e89\u4e5f\u662fVC\u7684\u7ade\u4e89\uff0c\u56fd\u5185VC\u51fa\u6d77\u5e94\u8be5\u662f\u6ca1\u4ec0\u4e48\u673a\u4f1a\u4e86\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Beyond facilitating a low cost of capital and stock options for employees, governments can encourage tech startups by priming the pump of invention. Hence the third policy lesson: <strong>governments must invest in science<\/strong>\u2014both the <strong>training of young scientists<\/strong> and the<strong> fundamental research<\/strong> that is too far removed from commercialization to attract VC funding. I<strong>nvestments in university laboratories must be coupled with legal provisions that allow the resulting discoveries to be commercialized<\/strong>. In the United States, the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 allows universities to patent inventions made with the help of federal research grants and to license these patents to startups. As a result, many American universities have established <strong>sophisticated technology transfer offices<\/strong> that connect inventors to venture capitalists. Just as industrial clusters depend on rapid circulation of capital and people, so<strong> intellectual property must be freed to seek its most productive uses<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u653f\u7b56\u652f\u6301\u7684\u91cd\u70b9\u5e94\u8be5\u57f9\u517b\u79d1\u5b66\u5bb6\u548c\u57fa\u7840\u7814\u7a76\u3002\u8981\u5141\u8bb8\u79d1\u7814\u7684\u77e5\u8bc6\u4ea7\u6743\u88ab\u5546\u4e1a\u5316\uff0c\u8fd9\u4e5f\u662f\u56fd\u5185\u7684\u5de8\u5927\u673a\u9047\uff0c\u5e94\u8be5\u5bf9\u5176\u91cd\u70b9\u5173\u6ce8\uff0c\u4ece\u603b\u627e\u5bfb\u597d\u7684\u673a\u4f1a\u3002\u53ef\u4ee5\u8bb2\uff0c\u8fd9\u4e2a\u5fc5\u7136\u662f\u56fd\u5185\u786c\u79d1\u6280\u5927\u4f01\u4e1a\u7684\u6e90\u6cc9\u4e4b\u4e00\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Spend time with venture investors in China, and you sense the pressure that they feel. Gone are the days when Shirley Lin could finance Alibaba without attracting political attention; now that <strong>digital technology is power<\/strong>, venture capitalists are expected to serve on government committees and i<strong>nvest with an awareness of government priorities<\/strong>. On a trip to China in 2019, I interviewed a Beijing-based VC who spoke politely of the government\u2019s constructive leadership; then, when the interview was over and I switched my recorder off, the same VC denounced state interference bitterly. Although it is hard to be certain, the escalating clampdown since then seems likely to drive talent out of China. Meanwhile, half a century after Arthur Rock\u2019s heyday, <strong>Silicon Valley\u2019s freethinking and freewheeling entrepreneurial spirit remains staggering<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u56fd\u5185VC\u53ea\u80fd\u8ddf\u7740\u653f\u7b56\u8d70\u554a\u3002\u7845\u8c37\u7684\u81ea\u7531\u601d\u8003\u3001\u81ea\u7531\u653e\u4efb\u7684\u521b\u59cb\u4eba\u7cbe\u795e\u5728\u56fd\u5185\u590d\u5236\u8fd8\u4efb\u91cd\u9053\u8fdc\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In an age when artificial intelligence will overwhelm the war machines of yesteryear, Anduril\u2019s aspiration is to combine the coding virtuosity of a Google with the national-security focus of a Lockheed Martin. For U.S. national security, Anduril could be transformative. But the company also stands as a reminder of something even more significant.<strong> It embodies the audacity of the Valley and the special way of coming at the world that animates venture capital.<\/strong> If others are daunted by a problem, go there. Try and fail, don\u2019t fail to try. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Remember, above everything, <strong>the logic of the power law: the rewards for success will be massively greater than the costs of honorable setbacks<\/strong>. This invigorating set of axioms has turned America\u2019s venture-capital machine into an <strong>enduring pillar of national power<\/strong>. Six decades after the formation of Davis &amp; Rock, it remains unwise to bet against it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AI\u548c\u519b\u7528\u76f8\u7ed3\u5408\u662f\u5927\u52bf\u6240\u8d8b\u3002<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>11 Accel FB &amp; KPCB There is a saying in our busines [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1233","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-book"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6VzCl-jT","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":785,"url":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/?p=785","url_meta":{"origin":1233,"position":0},"title":"\u8bfb\u300a\u6c88\u5357\u9e4f\u4f20\u300b","author":"yizhayanorg@126.com","date":"2017 \u5e74 2 \u6708 18 \u65e5","format":false,"excerpt":"\u4f20\u8bf4\u4e2d\u795e\u4e00\u6837\u7684\u5b8c\u7f8e\u4eba\u7269\uff0c\u6ca1\u60f3\u5230\u8fd8\u6709\u4e2a\u4eba\u4f20\u8bb0\uff0c\u867d\u7136\u662f\u8bb0\u8005\u91c7\u8bbf\u5206\u6790\u4e3a\u4e3b\uff0c\u4f9d\u7136\u5bf9\u5f53\u4e0b\u7684\u6295\u8d44\u6709\u5f88\u591a\u501f\u9274\u3002\u7b80\u5355\u2026","rel":"","context":"\u5728\u201cBook\u201d\u4e2d","block_context":{"text":"Book","link":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/?cat=5"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1221,"url":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/?p=1221","url_meta":{"origin":1233,"position":1},"title":"The Power Law 2214-2","author":"yizhayanorg@126.com","date":"2022 \u5e74 4 \u6708 9 \u65e5","format":false,"excerpt":"\u63a5\u4e0a\u7bc7\uff0c\u8ba1\u5212\u8ba4\u771f\u5730\u628a\u8fd9\u672c\u4e66\u505a\u4e9b\u6458\u5f55\uff0c\u4f9b\u4ee5\u540e\u5e38\u56de\u6765\u7ffb\u7ffb\u3002 3 Von Sequoia & To\u2026","rel":"","context":"\u5728\u201cBook\u201d\u4e2d","block_context":{"text":"Book","link":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/?cat=5"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":828,"url":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/?p=828","url_meta":{"origin":1233,"position":2},"title":"\u300a\u6295\u8d44\u7684\u62a4\u57ce\u6cb3\u300b\u5fc5\u8bfb\u4e09 1802","author":"yizhayanorg@126.com","date":"2018 \u5e74 9 \u6708 9 \u65e5","format":false,"excerpt":"\u62a4\u57ce\u6cb3\u8fd9\u4e2a\u8bcd\uff0c\u542c\u8bf4\u7684\u591a\uff0c\u5206\u6790\u7684\u5c11\uff0c\u8ba4\u771f\u601d\u8003\u7684\u5c11\u3002\u8fd9\u672c\u4e66\u5c31\u663e\u5f97\u7279\u522b\u96be\u80fd\u53ef\u8d35\uff0c\u5206\u6790\u7684\u900f\u5f7b\uff0c\u80fd\u591f\u6d1e\u7a7f\u4e16\u754c\uff0c\u2026","rel":"","context":"\u5728\u201cBook\u201d\u4e2d","block_context":{"text":"Book","link":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/?cat=5"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1761,"url":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/?p=1761","url_meta":{"origin":1233,"position":3},"title":"\u98ce\u548c\u6295\u8d44\u968f\u7b14 2514","author":"yizhayanorg@126.com","date":"2025 \u5e74 11 \u6708 19 \u65e5","format":false,"excerpt":"\u80e1\u731b\u5148\u751f\u7684\u6295\u8d44\u4e4b\u9053\uff0c\u5468\u4e00\u5728\u5361\u8428\u673a\u573a\u542c\u6700\u8fd1\u80e1\u5148\u751f\u5728\u5b66\u6821\u7684\u8bb2\u5ea7\u5f55\u97f3\u65f6\u5341\u5206\u6709\u611f\u89e6\uff0c\u8fd9\u624d\u662f\u771f\u6b63\u901a\u900f\u7684\u6295\u8d44\u4e4b\u9053\u2026","rel":"","context":"\u5728\u201cBook\u201d\u4e2d","block_context":{"text":"Book","link":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/?cat=5"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1076,"url":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/?p=1076","url_meta":{"origin":1233,"position":4},"title":"\u300a\u4f30\u503c\u7684\u6807\u5c3a\u300b2110","author":"yizhayanorg@126.com","date":"2021 \u5e74 5 \u6708 30 \u65e5","format":false,"excerpt":"\u770b\u9898\u76ee\u4e70\u7684\u4e66\uff0c\u4f30\u503c\u59cb\u7ec8\u662f\u6211\u4eec\u5de5\u4f5c\u4e0a\u7814\u7a76\u7684\u91cd\u70b9\u3002\u4f5c\u8005\u4e3b\u8981\u4ece\u4e8c\u7ea7\u5e02\u573a\u6765\u505a\u5206\u6790\uff0c\u5bf9\u4e00\u7ea7\u5e02\u573a\u4e5f\u5f88\u6709\u501f\u9274\u3002\u7167\u4f8b\u2026","rel":"","context":"\u5728\u201cBook\u201d\u4e2d","block_context":{"text":"Book","link":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/?cat=5"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":866,"url":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/?p=866","url_meta":{"origin":1233,"position":5},"title":"\u300a\u5468\u671f \u300b1909","author":"yizhayanorg@126.com","date":"2019 \u5e74 11 \u6708 20 \u65e5","format":false,"excerpt":"\u970d\u534e\u5fb7\u9a6c\u514b\u601d\u7684\u65b0\u4f5c\u3002\u65e9\u65e9\u5c31\u8bfb\u5b8c\u4e86\uff0c\u4f46\u7b14\u8bb0\u4e00\u76f4\u6ca1\u52a8\uff0c\u4eca\u65e5\u8865\u4e0a\u3002Howard Marks\u662f\u5df4\u83f2\u7279\u975e\u5e38\u63a8\u8350\u2026","rel":"","context":"\u5728\u201cBook\u201d\u4e2d","block_context":{"text":"Book","link":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/?cat=5"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1233","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1233"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1233\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1250,"href":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1233\/revisions\/1250"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1233"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1233"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.yizhayan.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1233"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}